Spitzer et al v. Aljoe et al

Filing 91

Discovery Order re: 90 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Meet-And-Confer Obligation Attending to Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/16/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

THOMAS A. SPITZER, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-05442-MEJ

Plaintiffs,
8

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY MEET AND
CONFER PROCEDURE

v.
9
10

TRISHA A. ALJOE, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

The Court is in receipt of the parties' request, filed March 13, 2015, regarding the in-person

14

meet and confer requirement for a discovery dispute regarding a deposition subpoena served on J.

15

Benjamin McGrew. Dkt. No. 90. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the request

16

to meet and confer by video conference or telephone. To ensure compliance with the spirit of the

17

meet and confer requirement, the parties shall make a contemporaneous record of their meetings

18

using a court reporter or electronic recording device.

19
20
21

If the parties are unable to resolve any disputes at the meet and confer session, the parties
shall draft a joint letter in compliance with the undersigned’s Discovery Standing Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: March 16, 2015
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge