Spitzer et al v. Aljoe et al

Filing 91

Discovery Order re: 90 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Meet-And-Confer Obligation Attending to Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/16/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 THOMAS A. SPITZER, et al., Case No. 13-cv-05442-MEJ Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY MEET AND CONFER PROCEDURE v. 9 10 TRISHA A. ALJOE, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 The Court is in receipt of the parties' request, filed March 13, 2015, regarding the in-person 14 meet and confer requirement for a discovery dispute regarding a deposition subpoena served on J. 15 Benjamin McGrew. Dkt. No. 90. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the request 16 to meet and confer by video conference or telephone. To ensure compliance with the spirit of the 17 meet and confer requirement, the parties shall make a contemporaneous record of their meetings 18 using a court reporter or electronic recording device. 19 20 21 If the parties are unable to resolve any disputes at the meet and confer session, the parties shall draft a joint letter in compliance with the undersigned’s Discovery Standing Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 16, 2015 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?