Alexis et al v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.
Filing
53
STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER re 52 STIPULATION re 42 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, 49 Clerks Notice, Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings, To Continue Hearing On Motion To Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Motion Hearing set for 7/10/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/2/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2014)
1 TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576)
tnarita@snllp.com
2 LIANA MAYILYAN (SBN 295203)
lmayilyan@snllp.com
3 SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010
4 San Francisco, CA 94104-4816
Telephone: (415) 283-1000
5 Facsimile: (415) 352-2625
6 Yaniv Adar (FL SBN 63804) (Pro Hac Vice)
yadar@homerbonner.com
7 HOMER BONNER JACOBS
1441 Brickell Avenue
8 Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 350-5100
9 Facsimile: (305) 372-2738
10 Attorneys for Defendant
Corinthian Colleges, Inc. d/b/a
11 Everest College
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
CARMELITA ALEXIS, DARICE
NICHOLS and EDITH LOPEZ,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
vs.
19
20
21
22
CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC.
d/b/a EVEREST COLLEGE; and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-05446-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
AS MODIFIED
Current Hearing Date: July 10, 2014
New Hearing Date: August 7, 2014
23
24
25
26
27
28
CARMELITA ALEXIS, ET AL. V. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC. (CASE NO.: 13-cv-05446-VC)
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
1
Plaintiffs Carmelita Alexis, Darice Nichols, Edith Lopez and Tracy Davis
2 (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Corinthian College, Inc. d/b/a Everest College (“the
3 School”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby
4 stipulate as follows:
5
WHEREAS the School filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended
6 Complaint on May 21, 2014 noticing a hearing for the afternoon of July 10, 2014 at
7 1:30 p.m. (Doc. No. 42);
8
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2014, the Court sent a notice advancing the hearing
9 date to the morning of July 10, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. (Doc. No. 49);
10
WHEREAS the lead counsel for the School has preexisting business travel
11 plans to Arizona, and was planning to return in time for the afternoon hearing on July
12 10, 2014, but counsel cannot make it back from Arizona in time for the hearing at
13 10:00 a.m.;
14
WHEREAS counsel for the School has been advised that the Court does not
15 allow for telephonic appearances of counsel who will argue motions;
16
THEREFORE the Parties, by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and
17 agree to request that the hearing on the School’s Motion to Dismiss the Second
18 Amended Complaint, presently set for July 10, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., be continued to
19 August 7, 2014. July 10, 2014, at 1:30 p.m.
20
21 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22
23
24
DATED: July 1, 2014
SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP
TOMIO B. NARITA
LIANA MAYILYAN
25
26
27
28
By:
s/Liana Mayilyan
Liana Mayilyan
Attorneys for Defendant
Corinthian Colleges, Inc. d/b/a
Everest College
CARMELITA ALEXIS, ET AL. V. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC. (CASE NO.: 13-cv-05446-VC)
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
1
1
DATED: July 1, 2014
HUSSIN LAW FIRM
TAMMY HUSSIN
2
By: s/ Tammy Hussin
Tammy Hussin
Attorney for Plaintiffs, Carmelita
Alexis, Daris Nichols, Edith Lopez and
Tracy Davis
3
4
5
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
15
ER
hhabr ia
R NIA
ince C
J u d ge V
H
14
RT
13
NO
12
_____________________
Hon. VinceORDERED
Chhabria
S SO
U.S.IDistrict JudgeD
IT
DIFIE
AS MO
FO
11
July 2, 2014
DATED:_____________________
LI
10
UNIT
ED
9
RT
U
O
S
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
7
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CARMELITA ALEXIS, ET AL. V. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC. (CASE NO.: 13-cv-05446-VC)
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?