Alexis et al v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.

Filing 53

STIPULATION AND MODIFIED ORDER re 52 STIPULATION re 42 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, 49 Clerks Notice, Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings, To Continue Hearing On Motion To Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Motion Hearing set for 7/10/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/2/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576) tnarita@snllp.com 2 LIANA MAYILYAN (SBN 295203) lmayilyan@snllp.com 3 SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010 4 San Francisco, CA 94104-4816 Telephone: (415) 283-1000 5 Facsimile: (415) 352-2625 6 Yaniv Adar (FL SBN 63804) (Pro Hac Vice) yadar@homerbonner.com 7 HOMER BONNER JACOBS 1441 Brickell Avenue 8 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 350-5100 9 Facsimile: (305) 372-2738 10 Attorneys for Defendant Corinthian Colleges, Inc. d/b/a 11 Everest College 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 CARMELITA ALEXIS, DARICE NICHOLS and EDITH LOPEZ, 17 Plaintiffs, 18 vs. 19 20 21 22 CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC. d/b/a EVEREST COLLEGE; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:13-cv-05446-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MODIFIED Current Hearing Date: July 10, 2014 New Hearing Date: August 7, 2014 23 24 25 26 27 28 CARMELITA ALEXIS, ET AL. V. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC. (CASE NO.: 13-cv-05446-VC) STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 1 Plaintiffs Carmelita Alexis, Darice Nichols, Edith Lopez and Tracy Davis 2 (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Corinthian College, Inc. d/b/a Everest College (“the 3 School”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby 4 stipulate as follows: 5 WHEREAS the School filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended 6 Complaint on May 21, 2014 noticing a hearing for the afternoon of July 10, 2014 at 7 1:30 p.m. (Doc. No. 42); 8 WHEREAS, on June 11, 2014, the Court sent a notice advancing the hearing 9 date to the morning of July 10, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. (Doc. No. 49); 10 WHEREAS the lead counsel for the School has preexisting business travel 11 plans to Arizona, and was planning to return in time for the afternoon hearing on July 12 10, 2014, but counsel cannot make it back from Arizona in time for the hearing at 13 10:00 a.m.; 14 WHEREAS counsel for the School has been advised that the Court does not 15 allow for telephonic appearances of counsel who will argue motions; 16 THEREFORE the Parties, by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and 17 agree to request that the hearing on the School’s Motion to Dismiss the Second 18 Amended Complaint, presently set for July 10, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., be continued to 19 August 7, 2014. July 10, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. 20 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 22 23 24 DATED: July 1, 2014 SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP TOMIO B. NARITA LIANA MAYILYAN 25 26 27 28 By: s/Liana Mayilyan Liana Mayilyan Attorneys for Defendant Corinthian Colleges, Inc. d/b/a Everest College CARMELITA ALEXIS, ET AL. V. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC. (CASE NO.: 13-cv-05446-VC) STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 1 1 DATED: July 1, 2014 HUSSIN LAW FIRM TAMMY HUSSIN 2 By: s/ Tammy Hussin Tammy Hussin Attorney for Plaintiffs, Carmelita Alexis, Daris Nichols, Edith Lopez and Tracy Davis 3 4 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 15 ER hhabr ia R NIA ince C J u d ge V H 14 RT 13 NO 12 _____________________ Hon. VinceORDERED Chhabria S SO U.S.IDistrict JudgeD IT DIFIE AS MO FO 11 July 2, 2014 DATED:_____________________ LI 10 UNIT ED 9 RT U O S 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 7 N D IS T IC T R OF C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CARMELITA ALEXIS, ET AL. V. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC. (CASE NO.: 13-cv-05446-VC) STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?