Kelleher v. Kelleher et al
Filing
114
ORDER GRANTING: 112 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 109 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 6/11/2015. Replies due by 6/15/2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/3/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
Kenneth Frucht, SBN 178881
Frederick J. Geonetta, SBN 114824
Geonetta & Frucht LLP
100 Montgomery Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 392-4844
Facsimile: (415) 392-7973
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
AMBER KELLEHER,
CASE NO. CV 13-5450
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
JOHN E. KELLEHER, et al,
15
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
ddd
ENLARGING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION
AND REPLY BRIEFS TO AMBER
D
KELLEHER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
(L.R. 6-2, et seq.)
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Courtroom: B, 15th Fl.
Judge: Hon. Maria-Elena James
Action Filed: November 25, 2013
Trial Date:
None
20
21
22
23
24
WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiff Amber Kelleher and Defendant John “Jack” Kelleher, all
other parties having been dismissed, have met and conferred regarding the timing of briefing for
Amber Kelleher’s motion for summary judgment noticed for hearing on July 2, 2015; and
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s moving papers were filed on May 21, 2015, opposition papers are therefore
due on Thursday, June 4, 2015, reply is due June 11; and
1
Stipulation and Order re Enlarging Time to File Opposition and Reply to Summary Judgment
Kelleher v. Kelleher, Norther Dist. Court Case No. 13-5450
1
2
WHEREAS, the parties agree that it would be in the interest of justice to enlarge the time for filing
3
opposition by one week and the reply briefs by four days; and
4
5
WHEREAS, the parties further agree that no prejudice would result from the proposed change
6
7
WHEREAS, no other change has been requested or made, and the proposed change will have no
8
other effect on the schedule of the case;
9
10
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
11
12
1) Any opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment currently set to be heard on July 2,
13
2015 shall be filed by June 11, 2015; and
14
2) Any reply shall be filed by June 15, 2015; and
15
3) There will be no change to the July 2, 2015 hearing date or time..
16
17
Dated: June 3, 2015
By:
/s/ Frederick J. Geonetta
FREDERICK J. GEONETTA
By:
/s/ Jay D. Adkisson
JAY D. ADKISSON
18
19
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
H
2
E
C
OF
D to T I C Judgment
Stipulation and Order re Enlarging Time to File Opposition and Reply I SSummaryT
R
Kelleher v. Kelleher, Norther Dist. Court Case No. 13-5450
R NIA
S
RT
28
NO
27
By: _____________________ s
a Jame
District Court len
Maria-E Judge
Judge
FO
26
LI
25
Dated: June 3, 2015
UNIT
ED
24
RT
U
O
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
22
RN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?