Dunn v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America, A New York Entity et al

Filing 151

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 150 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP) DAVID W. LONG-DANIELS (PHV) 2 PETER N. HALL (PHV) 1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900 3 Los Angeles, California 90067 4 Telephone: (310) 586-7700 Facsimile: (310) 586-7800 5 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 6 KORAY J. BULUT (SBN 230298) Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000 7 San Francisco, California 94112 (415) 655-1300 8 Telephone: Facsimile: (415) 707-2010 9 bulutk@gtlaw.com 10 Attorneys for Defendant TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 KATHLEEN DUNN and PATRICK CAMPBELL, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, 18 19 vs. 20 TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, a New York entity; EXPERIS US, INC.; PRIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; and DOES 1 to 10, 21 22 CASE No. 3:13-cv-05456-HSG REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT JOINT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT HEARING; ORDER Date: May 7, 2015 Time: 2:00 p.m. Dept: Courtroom 15, 18th Floor 23 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 Defendant Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America ("Defendant"), by its 3 undersigned counsel, respectfully request the Court to allow its lead counsel, David Long-Daniels, to 4 appear telephonically for the hearing on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of the Settlement 5 Agreement, set for May 7, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. because Mr. Long-Daniels has a conflicting out-of-state 6 court appearance on the same date. Defendant’s San Francisco-based counsel, Koray Bulut, will attend 7 the hearing in person. 8 9 10 11 12 DATED: May 5, 2015 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP By /s/ Koray J. Bulut Koray J. Bulut Attorneys for Defendant MEDTRONIC, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 ORDER The Court, having reviewed Defendant’s request to allow counsel David Long-Daniels to attend 3 telephonically, and finding good cause, grants the motion. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 5824 6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. 5 6 Dated: May 6, 2015 _______________________________ 7 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 4 5 6 7 I am employed in the aforesaid county, State of California; I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000, San Francisco, California 94111. On the date given below, I served the foregoing REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT JOINT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER on the interested parties in this action as follows: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (BY CM/ECF) Pursuant to CM/ECF System, registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes service through the Court's transmission facilities. The Court's CM/ECF system sends an e-mail notification of the filing to the parties and counsel of record who are registered with the Court's CM/ECF system. (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. (FEDERAL) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am employed at the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 16 Executed on May 5, 2015, at San Francisco, California. 17 18 19 By: /s/ Sharon J. Skandalaris _____________ Sharon J. Skandalaris 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?