Dunn v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America, A New York Entity et al
Filing
151
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 150 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2015)
1 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP)
DAVID W. LONG-DANIELS (PHV)
2 PETER N. HALL (PHV)
1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900
3 Los Angeles, California 90067
4 Telephone: (310) 586-7700
Facsimile: (310) 586-7800
5
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
6 KORAY J. BULUT (SBN 230298)
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
7 San Francisco, California 94112
(415) 655-1300
8 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(415) 707-2010
9 bulutk@gtlaw.com
10 Attorneys for Defendant
TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
KATHLEEN DUNN and PATRICK
CAMPBELL, individually and on behalf
of all other similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
18
19
vs.
20
TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUITY
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, a New
York entity; EXPERIS US, INC.; PRIDE
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; and DOES 1 to
10,
21
22
CASE No. 3:13-cv-05456-HSG
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE AT JOINT SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT HEARING; ORDER
Date: May 7, 2015
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Dept: Courtroom 15, 18th Floor
23
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
2
Defendant Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America ("Defendant"), by its
3 undersigned counsel, respectfully request the Court to allow its lead counsel, David Long-Daniels, to
4 appear telephonically for the hearing on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of the Settlement
5 Agreement, set for May 7, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. because Mr. Long-Daniels has a conflicting out-of-state
6 court appearance on the same date. Defendant’s San Francisco-based counsel, Koray Bulut, will attend
7 the hearing in person.
8
9
10
11
12
DATED: May 5, 2015
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
By
/s/ Koray J. Bulut
Koray J. Bulut
Attorneys for Defendant MEDTRONIC, INC.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
ORDER
The Court, having reviewed Defendant’s request to allow counsel David Long-Daniels to attend
3 telephonically, and finding good cause, grants the motion. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 5824 6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance.
5
6 Dated: May 6, 2015
_______________________________
7
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
8
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
3
4
5
6
7
I am employed in the aforesaid county, State of California; I am over the age of 18 years
and not a party to the within action; my business address is 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000,
San Francisco, California 94111.
On the date given below, I served the foregoing REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE AT JOINT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT HEARING; [PROPOSED]
ORDER on the interested parties in this action as follows:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
(BY CM/ECF)
Pursuant to CM/ECF System, registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes service through
the Court's transmission facilities. The Court's CM/ECF system sends an e-mail
notification of the filing to the parties and counsel of record who are registered with the
Court's CM/ECF system.
(STATE)
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
(FEDERAL)
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I am
employed at the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service
was made.
16
Executed on May 5, 2015, at San Francisco, California.
17
18
19
By: /s/ Sharon J. Skandalaris _____________
Sharon J. Skandalaris
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?