Dunn v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of America, A New York Entity et al

Filing 51

ORDER APPROVING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE re 48 Proposed Order, filed by Pride Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/12/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2014)

Download PDF
4 SEGAL SKIGEN LLP LAWRENCE SEGAL [BAR NO. 101339] WAYNE D. SKIGEN [BAR NO. 100249] 9595 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 201 Beverly Hills, California 90212-2504 Telephone: (310) 550-4840 Facsimile: (310) 550-4848 5 Attorneys for Defendant Pride Technologies, LLC 1 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KATHLEEN DUNN and PATRICK CAMPBELL, individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No.: 3:13-cv-05456-EMC Assigned to The Honorable Edward Chen 12 PRIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’S REQUEST FOR COURTCALL TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER (modified) Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 16 TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, a New York entity; EXPERIS US, INC.; PRIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 17 Date: June 5, 2014 Time: 1:30 P.M. 9:30 a.m. Courtroom: 5 Action Filed: November 25, 2013 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 Defendant Pride Technologies, LLC (“Pride”) respectfully requests permission for its 22 counsel, Lawrence Segal, to appear telephonically for a CourtCall telephonic calendar appearance in 23 connection with the June 5, 2014 hearing on co-defendant Teachers Insurance & Annuity 24 Association of America’s (“TIAA”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, a 25 motion in which Pride joins but for which Pride has submitted no additional substantive papers. In 26 the alternative, Pride requests to be excused altogether from appearing in person or by telephone, as 27 Pride does not anticipate adding anything substantive beyond the arguments made by counsel for 28 TIAA. 1 PRIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’S REQUEST FOR COURTCALL TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER (Case No. 3:13-cv-05456-EMC) 1 This request is premised on the following: Pride’s California counsel for this matter is 2 located in Southern California. Pride has requested that its counsel appear by telephone, if permitted 3 by the Court, in an effort to minimize the attorney’s fees and travel costs resulting from attorney 4 travel time and travel costs that Pride otherwise will incur attending the hearing in person. Pride 5 estimates that, by attending telephonically, Pride will be able to save close to $4,000 in attorney’s 6 fees and travel costs that it otherwise will have to incur simply to join in TIAA’s motion – a motion 7 in which Pride is only joining. 8 9 10 Pride has contacted counsel for all of the other parties by email, asking them to consent to Pride appearing telephonically. Counsel for all parties have consented to Pride attending the Motion to Dismiss hearing by telephone. Respectfully submitted, 11 12 DATED: May 5, 2014 SEGAL SKIGEN LLP By /s/ Lawrence Segal Lawrence Segal Wayne D. Skigen Attorneys for Defendant Pride Technologies, LLC 13 14 15 16 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’S 17 REQUEST FOR COURTCALL TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE 18 The Court, having read and considered Pride Technologies, LLC’s Request for Courtcall 20 Telephonic Appearance, hereby GRANTS Defendant Pride Technologies, LLC’s request to make a 9:30 a.m. CourtCall telephonic calendar appearance for the June 5, 2014 hearing at 1:30 p.m. on Teachers 21 Insurance & Annuity Association of America’s (“TIAA”) Motion to Dismiss. [Alternatively, Pride’s 22 request to be excused from appearing in person or by telephone, thereby waiving its right to 23 participate in oral argument, is GRANTED.] Court to call Lawrence Segal between 9:30 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. on June 5, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA ORD T IS SO DIFIED I AS MO NO 2 n M. Che PRIDE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’S REQUEST rFOR COURTCALL TELEPHONIC Edwa d Judge FO 28 EDWARD M. CHEN United StatesERED Judge District RT APPEARANCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER (Case No. 3:13-cv-05456-EMC) H E LI 27 RT U O 26 5/12 DATED: _________________, 2014 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 25 S 24 UNIT ED 19

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?