Nazif v. Computer Sciences Corporation
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 Allowing Counsel to Appear at Status Conference by Phone filed by Computer Sciences Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/2/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Susan Kumagai
Cal. Bar No. 127667
skumagai@lkclaw.com
Rebecca K. Kimura
Cal. Bar No. 220420
rkimura@lkclaw.com
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
100 Spear Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, California 94105
T: 415-357-4600 | F: 415- 357-4605
Stephen L. Scott (pro hac vice)
Ala. Bar No. ASB-7280-O62S
sls@kullmanlaw.com
F. Daniel Wood Jr. (pro hac vice)
Ala. Bar No. ASB-6822-D65F
fdw@kullmanlaw.com
THE KULLMAN FIRM
600 University Park Place, Suite 340
Birmingham, Alabama 35209
T: 205-871-5858 | F: 205-871-5874
Attorneys for Defendant, Computer Sciences Corporation
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
FRED NAZIF, an individual,
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff,
v.
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation,
and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C13-05498 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ALLOWING COUNSEL FOR
DEFENDANT TO APPEAR AT
STATUS CONFERENCE BY PHONE
28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441
Complaint Filed: October 25, 2013
25
26
27
28
This stipulation is entered into by Christopher LeClerc on behalf of Fred Nazif
(“Plaintiff”) and F. Daniel Wood Jr. on behalf of Computer Sciences Corporation (“Defendant”).
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT TO APPEAR AT
STATUS CONFERENCE BY PHONE
NAZIF V. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION (N.D. CAL., CASE NUMBER C13-05498 EMC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
The parties hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel Chris LeClerc will appear at the Status Conference
October 16, 2014 for Plaintiff;
WHEREAS Defendant’s counsel Rebecca Kimura will appear at the Status Conference
for Defendant; and
WHEREAS Defendant’s lead counsel, admitted pro hac vice, reside out-of-state (in
7
Alabama) and request leave of Court to appear for Defendant at the Status Conference via
8
telephone.
9
10
11
12
13
14
It is therefore stipulated and agreed as follows:
1.
That Defendant requests, and Plaintiff consents to, leave for Defendant’s counsel,
admitted pro hac vice, to appear for Defendant at the Status Conference via telephone; and
2.
Defendant’s counsel, admitted pro hac vice, may be reached for the Conference at
205-871-5858.
In accordance with Northern District of California General Order 45, the filer of this
15
document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from
16
the other signatory hereto.
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
18
DATED October 1, 2014
Le Clerc & Le Clerc LLP
19
By: /s/ Christopher R. LeClerc
Christopher R. LeClerc, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff, Fred Nazif
20
21
DATED October 1, 2014
The Kullman Firm
22
By: /s/ F. Daniel Wood Jr.
F. Daniel Wood Jr. (pro hac vice)
23
24
Attorneys for Defendant,
Computer Sciences Corporation
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT TO APPEAR AT
STATUS CONFERENCE BY PHONE
NAZIF V. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION (N.D. CAL., CASE NUMBER C13-05498 EMC)
1
S
UNIT
ED
10/2/14
DATE:_______________________
__________________________________
United States District Judge DERED
OR
Edward M. ChenIS SO
IT
ard M.
NO
7
RT
8
ER
H
9
dw
Judge E
10
Chen
FO
6
LI
5
RT
U
O
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
R NIA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
A
2
ORDER
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT TO APPEAR AT
STATUS CONFERENCE BY PHONE
NAZIF V. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION (N.D. CAL., CASE NUMBER C13-05498 EMC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?