Bedwell et al v. Amdocs, Inc.

Filing 46

ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 11/21/14 is continued to 12/19/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/20/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Laura M. Jordan (admitted pro hac vice) R. Nelson Williams (admitted pro hac vice) THOMPSON COBURN LLP One US Bank Plaza St. Louis, Missouri 63101 Telephone: 314-552-6000 Facsimile: 314-552-7469 ljordan@thompsoncoburn.com rwilliams@thompsoncoburn.com Michael S. Kun (State Bar No. 208684) EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 1925 Century Park East, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: 310-556-8861 Facsimile: 310-553-2165 mkun@ebglaw.com Attorneys for Defendant 11 AMDOCS, INC. 12 (Additional counsel listed on next page) 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 JOHN BEDWELL, 17 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:13-cv-05565-SI 18 Judge: v. JOINT STATUS REPORT Susan Y. Illston 19 AMDOCS, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STATUS REPORT - CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05565-SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. FALVEY Thomas W. Falvey (State Bar No. 65744) thomaswfalvey@gmail.com 550 No. Brand Blvd., Suite 1500 Glendale, CA 91203 Tel. 818-547-5200 Fax. 818-500-9307 V James DeSimone (State Bar No. 119668) vjdesimone@gmail.com Michael D. Seplow (State Bar No. 150183) mseplow@gmail.com SCHONBRUN DESIMONE SEPLOW HARRIS & HOFFMAN LLP 723 Ocean Front Walk Venice, California 90291 Telephone: 310-396-0731 Facsimile: 310-396-0731 14 15 Lawrence A. Bohm (State Bar No. 208716) LBohm@Bohmlaw.com 16 BOHM LAW GROUP 17 4600 Northgate Blvd Ste 210 Sacramento, CA 95834 18 Telephone: (916) 927-5574 19 Fax: (916) 927-2046 20 21 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1JOINT STATUS REPORT - CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05565-SI 1 2 TO THE COURT AND ALL INTERESTED PARTIES: Plaintiff John Bedwell and Defendant Amdocs, Inc. hereby submit the 3 4 5 6 following Joint Status Report regarding the status of this case and the two related cases (Anderson v. Amdocs, Case No. 3:13-cv-03483-SI and Zemitis v Amdocs, Case No. 3:14-cv-03485-SI.) 7 1. 8 of Settlement was filed on October 10, 2014 (See Anderson Dkt. No. 10). In light 9 of the notice of settlement, the Court issued an order dismissing the action without The parties recently reached a resolution of the Anderson case and a Notice 10 prejudice on October 15, 2014 (See Anderson Dkt. No. 11). The parties anticipate 11 filing a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice within the next 30 days. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2. Counsel for the parties continue to discuss attempting to resolve both the instant Bedwell case and the related Zemitis case and the parties propose that that current Case Management Conferences in these matters (currently set for November 21, 2014) be continued or taken off calendar and that the parties file another Status Report on or before November 21, 2014 in which they may request that the matters be referred to the Hon. Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, for a settlement conference or that the cases be set for a case management conference. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2JOINT STATUS REPORT - CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05565-SI 1 2 3 DATED: October 20, 2014 THOMPSON COBURN LLP 4 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 5 By: 6 /s/ Laura M. Jordan Laura M. Jordan R. Nelson Williams Michael S. Kun Attorneys for Defendant AMDOCS, INC. 7 8 9 10 DATED: October 20, 2014 11 SCHONBRUN DESIMONE SEPLOW HARRIS & HOFFMAN LLP By: 12 /s/ Michael D. Seplow V. James DeSimone Michael D. Seplow Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN BEDWELL 13 14 15 16 27 TED n an Illsto ER H 26 us Judge S RT 25 GRAN FO 24 UNIT ED 23 RT U O 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA NO 21 S 20 R NIA 19 LI 18 The case management conference shall be continued to 12/19/14, at 3 p.m. A joint case management conference statement is to be filed on or before 12/12/14. A 17 N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 -3JOINT STATUS REPORT - CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05565-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?