Bedwell et al v. Amdocs, Inc.
Filing
46
ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 11/21/14 is continued to 12/19/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/20/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Laura M. Jordan (admitted pro hac vice)
R. Nelson Williams (admitted pro hac vice)
THOMPSON COBURN LLP
One US Bank Plaza
St. Louis, Missouri 63101
Telephone: 314-552-6000
Facsimile: 314-552-7469
ljordan@thompsoncoburn.com
rwilliams@thompsoncoburn.com
Michael S. Kun (State Bar No. 208684)
EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
1925 Century Park East, Suite 500
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: 310-556-8861
Facsimile: 310-553-2165
mkun@ebglaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
11 AMDOCS, INC.
12 (Additional counsel listed on next page)
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16 JOHN BEDWELL,
17
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-05565-SI
18
Judge:
v.
JOINT STATUS REPORT
Susan Y. Illston
19 AMDOCS, INC. and DOES 1 through
10, inclusive,
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STATUS REPORT
- CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05565-SI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS W. FALVEY
Thomas W. Falvey (State Bar No. 65744)
thomaswfalvey@gmail.com
550 No. Brand Blvd., Suite 1500
Glendale, CA 91203
Tel. 818-547-5200
Fax. 818-500-9307
V James DeSimone (State Bar No. 119668)
vjdesimone@gmail.com
Michael D. Seplow (State Bar No. 150183)
mseplow@gmail.com
SCHONBRUN DESIMONE SEPLOW
HARRIS & HOFFMAN LLP
723 Ocean Front Walk
Venice, California 90291
Telephone: 310-396-0731
Facsimile: 310-396-0731
14
15 Lawrence A. Bohm (State Bar No. 208716)
LBohm@Bohmlaw.com
16 BOHM LAW GROUP
17 4600 Northgate Blvd Ste 210
Sacramento, CA 95834
18 Telephone: (916) 927-5574
19 Fax: (916) 927-2046
20
21 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1JOINT STATUS REPORT
- CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05565-SI
1
2
TO THE COURT AND ALL INTERESTED PARTIES:
Plaintiff John Bedwell and Defendant Amdocs, Inc. hereby submit the
3
4
5
6
following Joint Status Report regarding the status of this case and the two related
cases (Anderson v. Amdocs, Case No. 3:13-cv-03483-SI and Zemitis v Amdocs,
Case No. 3:14-cv-03485-SI.)
7
1.
8
of Settlement was filed on October 10, 2014 (See Anderson Dkt. No. 10). In light
9
of the notice of settlement, the Court issued an order dismissing the action without
The parties recently reached a resolution of the Anderson case and a Notice
10 prejudice on October 15, 2014 (See Anderson Dkt. No. 11). The parties anticipate
11 filing a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice within the next 30 days.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2.
Counsel for the parties continue to discuss attempting to resolve both the
instant Bedwell case and the related Zemitis case and the parties propose that that
current Case Management Conferences in these matters (currently set for
November 21, 2014) be continued or taken off calendar and that the parties file
another Status Report on or before November 21, 2014 in which they may request
that the matters be referred to the Hon. Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, for
a settlement conference or that the cases be set for a case management conference.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JOINT STATUS REPORT
- CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05565-SI
1
2
3
DATED: October 20, 2014
THOMPSON COBURN LLP
4
EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
5
By:
6
/s/ Laura M. Jordan
Laura M. Jordan
R. Nelson Williams
Michael S. Kun
Attorneys for Defendant
AMDOCS, INC.
7
8
9
10
DATED: October 20, 2014
11
SCHONBRUN DESIMONE SEPLOW HARRIS
& HOFFMAN LLP
By:
12
/s/ Michael D. Seplow
V. James DeSimone
Michael D. Seplow
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN BEDWELL
13
14
15
16
27
TED
n
an Illsto
ER
H
26
us
Judge S
RT
25
GRAN
FO
24
UNIT
ED
23
RT
U
O
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
NO
21
S
20
R NIA
19
LI
18
The case management conference shall be continued to 12/19/14, at 3 p.m.
A joint case management conference statement is to be filed on or before
12/12/14.
A
17
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
28
-3JOINT STATUS REPORT
- CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05565-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?