Innovative Automation LLC v. Kno Inc.

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/21/14. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2014)

Case3:13-cv-05648-JD Document34 Filed08/20/14 Page1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ADAM J. GUTRIDE (S.B.N. 181446)
[e-mail]
SETH A. SAFIER (S.B.N. 197427)
[e-mail]
TODD KENNEDY (S.B.N. 250267)
[e-mail]
MARIE A. MCCRARY (S.B.N. 262670)
[e-mail]
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
835 Douglas St.
San Francisco, CA 94114
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Innovative
Automation LLC

Adam R. Alper (S.B.N. 196834)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Timothy G. Majors (S.B.N. 228275)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Kno, Inc.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

INNOVATIVE AUTOMATION LLC,

Case No. 13-cv-05648-JD

16

Plaintiff,

Related Case Nos.
13-cv-05650-JD
13-cv-05651-JD
14-cv-00165-JD

17
18
19

v.
KNO, INC.,
Defendant.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

20
21

Plaintiff Innovative Automation LLC (“Innovative Automation”) and Defendant Kno, Inc.

22

(“Kno”) (collectively, the “Parties”) file this Stipulation of Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil

23

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) because the Parties have resolved all claims and counterclaims between

24

them in this litigation, and jointly stipulate to the dismissal of same, and that Innovative

25

Automation’s claims brought in this litigation against Kno are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

26

Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

27

A proposed Order is attached.

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO. 13-CV-05648-JD

Case3:13-cv-05648-JD Document34 Filed08/20/14 Page2 of 5

1

DATED: August 19, 2014

2

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Todd Kennedy
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (S.B.N. 181446)
[e-mail]
SETH A. SAFIER (S.B.N. 197427)
[e-mail]
TODD KENNEDY (S.B.N. 250267)
[e-mail]
MARIE A. MCCRARY (S.B.N. 262670)
[e-mail]
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
835 Douglas St.
San Francisco, CA 94114
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff Innovative Automation LLC

10
11

/s/ Timothy Majors
Adam R. Alper (S.B.N. 196834)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15

Timothy G. Majors (S.B.N. 228275)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

16
17
18
19

Attorneys for Defendant Kno, Inc.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

-2-

CASE NO. 13-cv-05648-JD

Case3:13-cv-05648-JD Document34 Filed08/20/14 Page3 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ADAM J. GUTRIDE (S.B.N. 181446)
[e-mail]
SETH A. SAFIER (S.B.N. 197427)
[e-mail]
TODD KENNEDY (S.B.N. 250267)
[e-mail]
MARIE A. MCCRARY (S.B.N. 262670)
[e-mail]
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
835 Douglas St.
San Francisco, CA 94114
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Innovative
Automation LLC

Adam R. Alper (S.B.N. 196834)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Timothy G. Majors (S.B.N. 228275)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Kno, Inc.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

INNOVATIVE AUTOMATION LLC,

Case No. 13-cv-05648-JD

16

Plaintiff,

Related Case Nos.
13-cv-05650-JD
13-cv-05651-JD
14-cv-00165-JD

17
18
19

v.
KNO, INC.,
Defendant.

xxxxxxxxxx
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

20
21

Plaintiff Innovative Automation LLC (“Innovative Automation”) and Defendant Kno, Inc.

22

(“Kno”) (collectively, the “Parties”) have announced to the Court that they have resolved all claims

23

and counterclaims between them in this litigation, and jointly stipulate to the dismissal of same.

24

Therefore, it is ORDERED that all of Innovative Automation’s claims brought in this litigation

25

against Kno are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO. 13-cv-05648-JD

Case3:13-cv-05648-JD Document34 Filed08/20/14 Page4 of 5

1

IT IS SO ORDERED

2

August
21st
Signed this _____ day of _______________, 2014.

3
4

HONORABLE JAMES DONATO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO. 13-cv-05648-JD

Case3:13-cv-05648-JD Document34 Filed08/20/14 Page5 of 5

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that the above signatory for Defendant has concurred and
consented to the filing of this document.

4
5

DATED: August 19, 2014

6

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Todd Kennedy
TODD KENNEDY
[e-mail]
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
835 Douglas St.
San Francisco, CA 94114
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff Innovative Automation LLC

11
12

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

13

The undersigned hereby certifies that on August 20, 2014, I caused the foregoing to be

14

electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the Court’s ECF system, which will send

15

electronic notification of such filing to all registered participants.

16
17

DATED: August 20, 2014

18

Respectfully submitted,

22

/s/ Todd Kennedy
TODD KENNEDY
[e-mail]
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
835 Douglas St.
San Francisco, CA 94114
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

23

Attorneys for Plaintiff Innovative Automation LLC

19
20
21

24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO. 13-cv-05648-JD