Bleak v. Spotify USA Inc.
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 STIPULATION EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO SPOTIFY USA INC.S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND FOR SPOTIFY TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE AND CONTINUING THE MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFEREN CE SCHED filed by Melissa Bleak. Reset Deadlines/Hearing as to 18 First MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action. Responses due by 3/10/2014. Replies due by 4/7/2014. Motion Hearing reset for 4/25/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17 th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Case Management Statement due by 4/18/2014. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 4/25/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/3/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
JULIAN HAMMOND (CA State Bar No. 268489)
HAMMONDLAW, PC
1180 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 610
Los Angeles, California 90035
Telephone:
(310) 601-6766
Facsimile:
(310) 295-2385
Email:
Hammond.julian@gmail.com
8
ARI CHERNIAK (CA State Bar No. 290071)
HAMMONDLAW, PC
1829 Reisterstown Road, Suite 410
Baltimore, Maryland 21208
Telephone:
(443) 739-5758
Facsimile:
(310) 295-2385
Email:
ari.cherniak@gmail.com
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff MELISSA BLEAK
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III (CA State Bar No. 169522)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 276-6500
Facsimile:
(415) 276-6599
Email:
joeaddiego@dwt.com
STEPHEN M. RUMMAGE (Admitted Pro hac)
CANDICE M. TEWELL (Admitted Pro hac vice)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, Washington 98101-3045
Telephone:
(206) 622-3150
Fax:
(206) 757-7700
Email:
steverummage@dwt.com
candicetewell@dwt.com
Attorneys for Defendant
SPOTIFY USA INC.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
MELISSA BLEAK, individually and on behalf )
of all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SPOTIFY USA INC., a Delaware corporation, )
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
Case No. CV 13-5653 CRB
STIPULATION EXTENDING THE
DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO SPOTIFY USA INC.’S
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
AND FOR SPOTIFY TO REPLY TO
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AND
CONTINUING THE MOTION HEARING
AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR
MARCH 21, 2014; ORDER
1
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO SPOTIFY’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, ETC.
Case No. CV 13-5653 CRB
1
TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL PARTIES BY AND THROUGH THEIR
2
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
3
Plaintiff MELISSA BLEAK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
4
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant SPOTIFY USA INC. (“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”), by
5
and through their attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:
6
7
8
9
On January 27, 2014 Defendant filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action in
the above-referenced case;
The current deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Compel Arbitration is
February 10, 2013;
10
The current deadline for Defendant to reply to Plaintiff’s response is February 18, 2014;
11
The Hearing on the Motion to Compel Arbitration is currently scheduled for March 21,
12
2014 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor of the above-referenced Court before the Hon.
13
Charles R. Breyer;
14
15
16
A Case Management Conference is scheduled for March 21, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. in
Courtroom 6, 17th Floor of the above-referenced Court before the Hon. Charles R. Breyer;
Plaintiff believes extending the deadlines for the responsive pleadings and continuing the
17
Motion Hearing is required in order to properly prepare her response and effectively prepare for
18
the Motion Hearing;
19
The Parties believe continuing the Case Management Conference to the same day as the
20
Motion Hearing will consolidate multiple hearings on this matter to the same date, thereby
21
creating additional efficiency;
22
23
24
25
26
27
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:
1. The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration
shall be extended to March 10, 2014;
2. The deadline for Defendant to reply to Plaintiff’s response shall be extended to
April 7, 2014;
3. The Motion Hearing currently scheduled for March 21, 2014 at 10:00 A.M. in
28
2
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO SPOTIFY’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, ETC.
Case No. CV 13-5653 CRB
1
Courtroom 6, 17th Floor of the above-referenced Court before the Hon. Charles R. Breyer shall be
2
continued until April 25, 2014 at 10:00 A.M.; and
3
4. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 21, 2014 at 8:30
4
A.M. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor of the above-referenced Court before the Hon. Charles R. Breyer
5
shall be continued until April 25, 2014 at 10:00 A.M.;
6
5. The parties shall meet and confer not less than thirty (30) days in advance of the
7
April 25, 2014, conference and shall file a joint case management statement in the form contained
8
in the Civil Local rules as supplemented by this Court’s January 22, 2014, Order Setting Case
9
Management Conference not less than seven (7) days in advance of the conference. The parties
10
shall serve their Rule 26(f) Initial Disclosures within fourteen (14) days of their meet and confer.
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12
13
DATED: January 31, 2014
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
14
By: /s/ Joseph E. Addegio /s/
Joseph E. Addiego III
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant SPOTIFY USA INC.
17
18
DATED: January 31, 2014
20
HAMMONDLAW, PC
By:
Julian Hammond
21
22
Attorneys for Plaintiff MELISSA BLEAK
23
DATED: February 3, 2014
UNIT
ED
ED
HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
RDER
IS SO O Court Judge
IT
United States District
26
27
NO
H
ER
LI
RT
3
J
A
28
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
R NIA
25
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
19
C
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO SPOTIFY’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, ETC.
Case No. CV 13-5653 CRB
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?