Lazarte v. Velocity Express et al

Filing 55

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, it is ordered that plaintiff's claims alleged against defendants herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 2, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 No. C 13-5654 MMC ELSA LAZARTE, Plaintiff, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 13 14 VELOCITY EXPRESS LEASING, INC., VELOCITY EXPRESS INC., VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC. 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this 18 19 cause, 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims alleged against defendants herein 21 be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to 22 this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on the opposing 23 parties, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the 24 foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the 25 calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 2, 2016 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?