Lazarte v. Velocity Express et al
Filing
55
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, it is ordered that plaintiff's claims alleged against defendants herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 2, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
No. C 13-5654 MMC
ELSA LAZARTE,
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
14
VELOCITY EXPRESS LEASING, INC.,
VELOCITY EXPRESS INC., VELOCITY
EXPRESS, LLC.
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this
18
19
cause,
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims alleged against defendants herein
21
be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to
22
this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on the opposing
23
parties, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the
24
foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the
25
calendar for further proceedings as appropriate.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 2, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?