Guerrero v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Filing
130
ORDER ADVANCING HEARING DATE, RE PAGE LIMITS, AND REQUESTING RESPONSES re 126 First MOTION for Summary Judgment, 125 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment, 128 First MOTION for Summary Judgment, 121 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment . Replies due by 4/1/2015 at noon. Motion Hearing set for 4/14/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup. Joint statement due by 4/9/2015 at noon. Joint list due by 4/13/2015 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 13, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
VICTOR GUERRERO,
9
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. C 13-05671 WHA
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATION; STATE PERSONNEL
BOARD; and, in their official capacities,
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of the California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation;
SUZANNE AMBROSE, Executive Officer of State
Personnel Board; K. CARROLL, Lieutenant; D.
SHARP, Sergeant; BARBARA LEASHORE,
Hearing Officer; C. HESTER, Lieutenant; V.
MAYOL, Lieutenant; S. COX, Lieutenant; V.
MYERS, Sergeant; JOHN (or JANE) DOES 1-100,
all of whose true names are unknown,
ORDER ADVANCING HEARING
DATE, RE PAGE LIMITS, AND
REQUESTING RESPONSES
Defendants.
/
19
20
Now pending are four dueling motions for summary judgment. In light of the substantial
21
overlap, the reply briefs must not exceed TEN PAGES. Reply declarations are disfavored.
22
The reply deadline is hereby advanced from April 2 to APRIL 1 AT NOON. The hearings on all
23
four motions are hereby advanced from April 16 to APRIL 14 AT 9:00 A.M. Please remember that
24
all existing deadlines remain in place despite the pending summary judgment motions. In other
25
words, all pretrial filings and disclosures must be made according to the deadlines stated in the
26
Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury Cases.
27
28
Plaintiff preserved a jury demand for his first and second claims for relief. By APRIL 9 AT
NOON, please file a joint statement confirming (1) whether a jury trial is still requested and
1
(2) which issues and claims would be decided by the jury versus the judge. If a jury trial is
2
requested, please promptly meet-and-confer in a good faith effort to agree on as much language as
3
possible for proposed substantive jury instructions. It is generally unhelpful when each side puts
4
in dueling proposed jury instructions for every issue without reading the other side’s proposal and
5
without considering whether there are areas of agreement. By APRIL 13 AT NOON, the parties
6
shall please file a joint list of motions in limine and the expected length of the trial.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: March 13, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?