Guerrero v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Filing
188
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 22, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2015)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
VICTOR GUERRERO,
8
Plaintiff,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 13-05671 WHA
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION;
STATE PERSONNEL BOARD; et al.,
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE
Defendants.
12
/
13
14
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ motions in limine.
15
1.
16
17
Guerrero moves to exclude certain testimony from David Starnes.
By APRIL 24 AT 2:00 P.M., please lodge chamber’s copies of Starnes’ full deposition transcript.
2.
To give Guerrero an opportunity to respond to the points raised in CDCR’s
18
opposition to Guerrero’s motion in limine number 5 (regarding CDCR Expert Jon Michael
19
DuMond), Guerrero has until APRIL 24 AT NOON, to file a reply brief (not to exceed three pages).
20
3.
Guerrero’s opposition to CDCR’s “motion in limine number 6” (motion seeking to
21
quash the subpoena against Secretary Jeffrey Beard and requesting sanctions) only argues that the
22
motion was not timely served. Does Guerrero intend to call Secretary Beard at trial?
23
What testimony, if any, would Secretary Beard offer? Guerrero has until APRIL 27 AT 9:00 A.M.,
24
to answer these questions and to fully respond to CDCR’s motion in a submission not to exceed
25
seven pages.
26
27
28
Dated: April 22, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?