Guerrero v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 250

REQUEST FOR MORE BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/7/2015. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
VICTOR GUERRERO,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION;
STATE PERSONNEL BOARD; et al.,

REQUEST FOR MORE
BRIEFING

Defendants.
/

16
17

No. C 13-05671 WHA

At the time the parties submit responses to the opposing side’s proposed findings of fact

18

and conclusions of law, please add one page and address the following: What does our trial

19

record show as to what notices or other reaction the IRS sends an employer after the employer

20

reports wages and withholding to the IRS under a SSN not validly issued to the employee? One

21

reading of Professor Caroline Chen’s trial testimony is that the IRS does not notify the employer

22

of the invalid SSN (but this is an inference, not a direct statement). Furthermore, what does our

23

trial record show concerning the extent to which an employer typically learns that one of its

24

employees is reporting taxes under an ITIN, and when it does learn, is this a tip off that the

25

employee is using an invalid SSN?

26
27
28

Dated: July 7, 2015.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE