Guerrero v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 54

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING. Summary Judgment Motion Hearing set for 10/2/2014 08:00 AM before Hon. William Alsup. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/14/2014. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 VICTOR GUERRERO, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 No. C 13-05671 WHA v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION; STATE PERSONNEL BOARD; and in their official capacities JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; SUZANNE AMBROSE, Executive Officer of State Personnel Board; K. CARROLL, Lieutenant; D. SHARP, Sergeant; BARBARA LEASHORE, Hearing Officer; C. HESTER, Lieutenant, V. MAYOL, Lieutenant; S. COX, Lieutenant; V. MYERS, Sergeant, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING Defendants. / The May 7 order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to dismiss set a 23 summary judgment schedule in order to adjudicate plaintiff’s Title VII and procedural due 24 process claims. The order set the motion hearing for September 25, 2014. 25 Defendant State Personnel Board moves to continue the motion hearing to October 2, 26 2014, because counsel for State Personnel Board will be observing Rosh Hashanah on 27 September 25. Counsel for State Personnel Board has represented that all counsel are available 28 for an October 2 hearing. Good cause shown, the motion hearing on defendants’ summary 1 judgment motions will be continued to October 2, 2014 at 8:00 a.m. No more continuances will 2 be granted. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: May 14, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?