Guerrero v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 99

ORDER RE HEARING DATE AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Responses due by 9/29/2014 at noon. Motion Hearing set for 9/30/2014 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 23, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VICTOR GUERRERO, 8 Plaintiff, 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 13-05671 WHA v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, et al., ORDER RE HEARING DATE AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Defendants. 12 / 13 14 1. The hearing on the pending motions for summary judgment is hereby reset for 15 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, AT 8:00 A.M. Plaintiff’s counsel shall please bring three 16 redlined copies of the proposed third amended complaint and copies of the motion for leave to 17 file a third amended complaint. 18 19 20 2. By NOON ON SEPTEMBER 29, the parties shall please file a joint statement answering the following questions. a. Dr. Bendick’s declaration stated that 25 applicants responded “yes” to 21 Question No. 75 and were withheld from eligibility. Of the 25 applicants, how many were 22 withheld for reasons without reference to use of a different social security number? 23 b. 24 security number? 25 c. How many were withheld solely on account of use of a different social Have plaintiff’s counsel reviewed the files to vet the information in 26 Exhibit B to the declaration of Robert O’Brien? Have plaintiff’s counsel determined the 27 reason(s) why each applicant who responded “yes” to Question No. 75 was withheld? 28 Dated: September 23, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?