Jaranilla v. Comcast Inc. et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING NOVEMBER 14, 2014 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC. Case Management Statement due by 1/9/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/16/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/10/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
TROY A. VALDEZ, State Bar No. 191478
ERIN M. DOYLE, State Bar No. 233113
VALDEZ TODD & DOYLE LLP
1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1450
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (415) 202-5950
Facsimile: (415) 202-5951
Email: tvaldez@vtdlaw.com
Email: edoyle@vtdlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC
7
8
9
10
DANIEL RAY BACON, State Bar No. 103866
Law Offices of Daniel Ray Bacon
234 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 864-0907
Facsimile: (415) 864-0989
Email: bacondr@aol.com
11
Attorney for Plaintiff MICHAEL A. JARANILLA
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15 MICHAEL A. JARANILLA,
Case No.: CV 13-05717 CRB
16
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING NOVEMBER 14, 2014
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
17 vs.
18 COMCAST INC., doing business as
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
19 MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COMCAST
20 HOLDINGS CORPORATION, and
COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania
21 Corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
22
Date: November 14, 2014
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING NOVEMBER 14, 2014 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE – Case No. CV-13-05717 CRB
1
2
3
WHEREAS, the parties conducted a Settlement Conference before the Hon. Joseph C. Spero
on July 22, 2014, which did not lead to settlement;
WHEREAS, the Court held a Further Case Management Conference on July 25, 2014,
4
following which the Court issued a Minute Order stating, “Parties are allowed to take discovery
5
which is appropriate to assist further settlement before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero” and
6
scheduling a Further Case Management Conference for November 14, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.;
7
WHEREAS, the parties are taking additional discovery to assist in further settlement
8
discussions, but not all such discovery has been completed, and the recent deposition of a key witness
9
scheduled for the end of October has been postponed due to the witness’s unexpected medical leave
10
11
of absence; and,
WHEREAS, to allow the parties time to complete key discovery to assist in productive further
12
settlement discussions, the parties respectfully request for this Court to continue the present
13
November 14, 2014 Further Case Management Conference to January 9, 2015 or a date thereafter.
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
Dated: November 6, 2014
17
VALDEZ TODD & DOYLE LLP
/s/ Erin M. Doyle
Erin M. Doyle
18
19
Attorneys for Defendant
Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC
20
21
22
23
Dated: November 6, 2014
Law Office of Daniel Ray Bacon
24
/s/ Daniel Ray Bacon
Daniel Ray Bacon
25
Attorney for Plaintiff
Michael A. Jaranilla
26
27
28
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING NOVEMBER 14, 2014 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE – Case No. CV-13-05717 CRB
1
The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
2
therefore, orders that the present November 14, 2014 Further Case Management Conference is hereby
3
continued to January 16, 2015 at 8:30 AM.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
S
Dated: November 10, 2014
RT
U
O
By: ___________________________________
UNIT
ED
D
ER
H
11
J
12
FO
RT
10
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
9
LI
8
R NIA
DERE
United States District Court Judge
SO OR California
Northern District of
IT IS
7
A
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING NOVEMBER 14, 2014 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE – Case No. CV-13-05717 CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?