Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al

Filing 141

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 140 Stipulation Granting Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
[e-mail]
LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
[e-mail]
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
[e-mail]
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JENNIFER A. KASH (Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
SEAN PAK (Bar No. 219032)
[e-mail]
IMAN LORDGOOEI (Bar No. 251320)
[e-mail]
SAM STAKE (Bar No. 257916)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

8
9
10
11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
FINJAN, INC.,

Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

15
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

v.

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING
LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS

PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

1

Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-6, Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.

2 (“Finjan”) and Defendant Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (“Defendants”)
3 (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following
4 request for leave to amend invalidity contentions served under Patent Local Rule 3-6:
5
6

WHEREAS, pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-1, Finjan served its disclosure of asserted claims
and infringement contentions (“Infringement Contentions”) on April 17, 2014;

7
8

WHEREAS, pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3, Defendants served their Invalidity Contentions

9 on June 9, 2014;
10

WHEREAS, the Court struck Finjan’s infringement contentions, in part, on April 2, 2015, but

11 granted leave, in part, for Finjan to amend its Infringement Contentions by April 23, 2015;
12
13

WHEREAS, the Court extended the briefing and hearing schedule for claim construction and
extended the close of fact discovery to September 2, 2015;

14
WHEREAS, the requested leave should not have any material effect on the remaining schedule
15
16
17

in this case;
WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the Parties agreed that there is good cause for

18 Defendants to supplement their invalidity contentions to the extent Finjan’s amended infringement
19 contentions provide new or different interpretation of the asserted claims;
20
21

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and request an order granting Defendants
leave to supplement their invalidity contentions by June 8, 2015 to the extent that Finjan’s amended

22
23
24

infringement contentions provide new or different interpretation of the asserted claims.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

25
26
27
28

1
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

Respectfully submitted,

1
2

KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP

3 Dated: April 17, 2015

/s/ Paul J. Andre
Paul J. Andre (State Bar No. 196585)
Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404)
James Hannah (State Bar No. 237978)
Hannah Lee (State Bar No. 253197)
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

12
13

QUINN EMANUAL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN LLP

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated: April 17, 2015

/s/ Jennifer A. Kash
Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
Sam Stake (Bar No. 257916)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

26
27
28

2
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

1
2
3
4
5

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

6 document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
7
8

/s/
Jennifer A. Kash
Jennifer A. Kash

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

1
ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
There being a showing of good cause based on the Parties’ stipulation, Proofpoint, Inc. and

4
5
6
7

Armorize Technologies, Inc. may supplement their invalidity contentions by June 8, 2015 to the extent
that Finjan’s Amended Infringement Contentions provide new or different interpretation of the asserted
claims.

8
9 DATED: 4/21/2015
10

________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG