Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al

Filing 239

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 237 Unopposed Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing re 236 Finjan's Motion to Require Defendants' to Conform to the Court's November 14, 2014 Case Management Order and Strike Theories Not Disclosed in Invalidity Contentions. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
[e-mail]
LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
[e-mail]
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
[e-mail]
HANNAH LEE (State Bar No. 253197)
[e-mail]
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

11
12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16

FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21

v.
PROOFPOINT, INC., and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.

Case No.: 13-cv-05808-HSG
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
FINJAN, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON
FINJAN, INC.’s MOTION TO REQUIRE
DEFENDANTS TO CONFORM TO THE
COURT’S NOVEMBER 14, 2014 CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER AND STRIKE
THEORIES NOT DISCLOSED IN
INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S UNOPP.
Case No.: 13-cv-05808-HSG
MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING

1

Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) Unopposed Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing on Finjan’s

2 Motion to Require Defendants to Conform to the Court’s November 14, 2014 Case Management
3 Order and Strike Theories Not Disclosed in Invalidity Contentions (“Finjan’s Motion”) was brought
4 before this Court. Upon consideration of Finjan’s Motion, the Declaration of Hannah Lee filed in
5

support of the motion, and the case file in this action, the Court finds there to be good cause to grant

6
Finjan’s Motion.
7
8

Therefore, Finjan’s Motion to Shorten Time is GRANTED. Finjan’s Motion will be heard on

9 December 17, 2015, and the parties shall comply with the following briefing schedule:
10

 November 20, 2015: Finjan files Motion

11

 December 4, 2015: Deadline for Defendants’ Opposition to Motion

12

 December 7, 2015: Deadline for Finjan’s Reply to Motion

13
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16

DATED: November 24, 2015

17

___________________________
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S UNOPP.
MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING

Case No.: 13-cv-05808-HSG