Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al

Filing 306

ORDER. (hsglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FINJAN, INC., Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER v. PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Defendants. 11 12 Case No. 13-cv-05808-HSG For all future briefing (including the upcoming summary judgment motions), the parties 13 are directed to include a specific pin cite for each citation to an exhibit. If specification is possible 14 at a more detailed level (i.e., paragraph number, line or section), the parties must do so. Citations 15 in the nature of “see generally” with reference to an entire exhibit are unacceptable, and the Court 16 will not consider any citations that do not at a minimum cite to a particular page. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 2/16/16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?