Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al
Filing
306
ORDER. (hsglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
FINJAN, INC.,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER
v.
PROOFPOINT, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
Case No. 13-cv-05808-HSG
For all future briefing (including the upcoming summary judgment motions), the parties
13
are directed to include a specific pin cite for each citation to an exhibit. If specification is possible
14
at a more detailed level (i.e., paragraph number, line or section), the parties must do so. Citations
15
in the nature of “see generally” with reference to an entire exhibit are unacceptable, and the Court
16
will not consider any citations that do not at a minimum cite to a particular page.
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 2/16/16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?