Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al

Filing 350

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 349 Stipulation Regarding Opening Daubert Motions. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
[e-mail]
LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
[e-mail]
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
[e-mail]
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JENNIFER A KASH (Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
SEAN PAK (Bar No. 219032)
[e-mail]
IMAN LORDGOOEI (Bar No. 251320)
[e-mail]
SAM STAKE (Bar No. 257916)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

8
9
10
11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
FINJAN, INC.,

Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

15
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

v.
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING OPENING DAUBERT
MOTIONS
Trial Date:

June 13, 2016

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and

2 Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (“Defendants,” collectively with
3 Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred in an effort to
4 agree upon a modified schedule for certain pretrial deadlines:
5

WHEREAS, the trial in this matter is currently scheduled for June 13, 2016;

6

WHEREAS, the Pre-trial Conference in this matter is currently scheduled for May 24, 2016;

7

WHEREAS, opening Daubert motions are currently due on April 15, 2016;

8

WHEREAS, the parties have made substantial effort to work together in good faith to stipulate

9 to narrow the potential issues in dispute by extending the deadline for opening Daubert motions by a
10 week, without altering any other pretrial deadlines or the trial date;
11

WHEREAS, on April 12, 2016 the Court issued an Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part

12 Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 247);
13

WHEREAS, on April 13, 2016 Defendants supplemented certain financial data previously

14 produced to Plaintiff (“supplemented financial data”);
15

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Plaintiff will serve a supplemental Expert Report of

16 Dr. Anne Layne-Farrar by Monday, April 18, 2016 to solely update the financial data in the attached
17 Schedules to reflect the supplemented financial data and the Court’s Order of April 12, 2016;
18

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that in response Defendants will serve a supplemental

19 Rebuttal Expert Report of Lance Gunderson by Wednesday, April 20, 2016 solely to update the
20 financial data in the attached Schedules to reflect the supplemented financial data and the Court’s
21 Order of April 12, 2016 and to respond to Dr. Layne-Farrar’s supplemental schedules;
22

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that each side may thereafter file a single Daubert opening

23 brief of up to 25 pages, but nothing in this stipulation precludes either side from seeking leave to file
24 an opening brief with additional pages upon a showing of good cause;
25

WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request the Court re-schedule the following pre-trial

26 deadlines:
27
28

1
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1
2

Original
Deadline

3
April 15, 2016
4
5
6

Stipulated
Proposed New
Deadline
April 22, 2016

Event

Opening Daubert Motions due

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and respectfully request certain pretrial
submissions deadlines be set as stipulated and proposed in the table above.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

Respectfully submitted,

1
2 Dated: April 14, 2016
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

By: /s/ James Hannah
Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
James Hannah (SBN 237978)
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

10
11

Respectfully submitted,

12
13 Dated: April 14, 2016
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash__________
Jennifer A Kash (Bar No. 203679)
Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
Sam Stake (Bar No. 257916)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

23
24
25
26
27
28

3
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

3 document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
4
5

/s/ Peter Klivans
Peter Klivans

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

ORDER

2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3

The Parties shall brief Daubert motions as set forth in the April 14, 2016 Stipulation

4 Regarding Opening Daubert Motions.
5
6 DATED: April 14, 2016
7

___________________________
The Honorable Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

5
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPENING DAUBERT MOTIONS