Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al

Filing 397

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 396 STIPULATION Regarding Oppositions to Motions in Limine. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
[e-mail]
LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
[e-mail]
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
[e-mail]
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JENNIFER A KASH (Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
SEAN PAK (Bar No. 219032)
[e-mail]
IMAN LORDGOOEI (Bar No. 251320)
[e-mail]
SAM STAKE (Bar No. 257916)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

8
9
10
11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
FINJAN, INC.,

Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

15
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

v.
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING OPPOSITIONS TO
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Trial Date:

June 13, 2016

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and

2 Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (“Defendants,” collectively with
3 Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred in an effort to
4 agree upon a modified schedule for Oppositions to Motions in Limine:
5

WHEREAS, the trial in this matter is currently scheduled for June 13, 2016;

6

WHEREAS, the Pre-Trial Conference in this matter is currently scheduled for May 24, 2016;

7

WHEREAS, Opposition to Motions in Limine are currently due on May 5, 2016;

8

WHEREAS, the Parties participated in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge

9 Cousins on May 5, 2016 (Dkt. 348) that lasted for much of the day;
10

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a limited, one-day extension for the Oppositions to

11 Motions In Limine;
12

WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request the Court re-schedule the following deadline:

13
14

Original
Deadline

15
May 5, 2016
16
17
18

Stipulated
Proposed New
Deadline
May 6, 2016

Event

Oppositions to Motions in Limine

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the deadline for
Oppositions to Motions in Limine be set as stipulated and proposed in the table above.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE

Respectfully submitted,

1
2 Dated: May 5, 2016
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

By: /s/ James Hannah
Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
James Hannah (SBN 237978)
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

10
11

Respectfully submitted,

12
13 Dated: May 5, 2016
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash
Jennifer A Kash (Bar No. 203679)
Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
Sam Stake (Bar No. 257916)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

23
24
25
26
27
28

2
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

3 document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
4
5

/s/ Peter Klivans
Peter Klivans

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE

1

ORDER

2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3

The Parties shall brief Oppositions to Motions in Limine as set forth in the May 5, 2016

4 Stipulation Regarding Oppositions to Motions in Limine.
5
6 DATED: May 6, 2016
7

___________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE