Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al
Filing
422
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 420 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in support of Daubert Motions. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2016)
<![CDATA[
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
FINJAN, INC.,
Case No. 3:13-CV-05808-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S MOTION FOR
12 HOUR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE
TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF
DAUBERT MOTIONS
Plaintiff,
vs.
PROOFPOINT, INC. AND ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.
Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”)
have filed a Motion for 12 Hour Extension of Deadline to File Replies in Support of Daubert
Motions.
Having considered the Motion, and good cause having been shown, the Court GRANTS
Defendants' Motion and ORDERS that the deadline for filing replies in support of Daubert
motions is extended from May 10, 2016 to May 11, 2016 at noon.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: ______________, 2016
May 10
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM , JR.
United States District Court Judge
05829-00001/7951541.1
Case No. 3:13-CV-05808-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
