Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al
Filing
431
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 426 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2016)
1 PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
pandre@kramerlevin.com
2 LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
3
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
4 jhannah@kramerlevin.com
HANNAH LEE (State Bar No. 253197)
5 hlee@kramerlevin.com
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
6 990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
7
Telephone: (650) 752-1700
8 Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
9 Attorneys for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.
10
11
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15 FINJAN, INC.,
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.: 13-cv-05808-HSG
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
FINJAN, INC.’S MOTION TO REMOVE
INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS
18
PROOFPOINT, INC., and ARMORIZE
19 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S ADMINISTRATIVE Case No. 13-cv-05808-HSG
MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS
1
Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) Administrative Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed
2 Documents which was brought before this Court. Finjan has moved for the court to remove
3 incorrectly filed Docket No. 424.
4
5
Having considered Finjan’s motion and supporting evidence, and it appearing to the Court that
good cause exists for the granting of the motion, Finjan’s motion is hereby GRANTED.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8 DATED: May 11, 2016
9
___________________________
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
__________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S ADMINISTRATIVE
Case No. 13-cv-05808-HSG
MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?