Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al

Filing 431

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 426 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585) pandre@kramerlevin.com 2 LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404) lkobialka@kramerlevin.com 3 JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978) 4 jhannah@kramerlevin.com HANNAH LEE (State Bar No. 253197) 5 hlee@kramerlevin.com KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 6 990 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 7 Telephone: (650) 752-1700 8 Facsimile: (650) 752-1800 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff FINJAN, INC. 10 11 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 FINJAN, INC., 16 17 Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 13-cv-05808-HSG ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS 18 PROOFPOINT, INC., and ARMORIZE 19 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ____________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S ADMINISTRATIVE Case No. 13-cv-05808-HSG MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS 1 Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) Administrative Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed 2 Documents which was brought before this Court. Finjan has moved for the court to remove 3 incorrectly filed Docket No. 424. 4 5 Having considered Finjan’s motion and supporting evidence, and it appearing to the Court that good cause exists for the granting of the motion, Finjan’s motion is hereby GRANTED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: May 11, 2016 9 ___________________________ Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 __________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S ADMINISTRATIVE Case No. 13-cv-05808-HSG MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?