Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al
Filing
440
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 432 Stipulation Regarding Replies in Support of Daubert Motions. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
pandre@kramerlevin.com
LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
jhannah@kramerlevin.com
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 752-1700
Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
JENNIFER A KASH (Bar No. 203679)
jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com
SEAN PAK (Bar No. 219032)
seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
IMAN LORDGOOEI (Bar No. 251320)
imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com
SAM STAKE (Bar No. 257916)
samstake@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.
Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
8
9
10
11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
FINJAN, INC.,
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
v.
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING REPLIES IN
SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS
Trial Date:
June 13, 2016
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and
1
2 Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (“Defendants,” collectively with
3 Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred in an effort to
4 agree upon a modified schedule for Replies in support of Daubert Motions :
5
WHEREAS, the trial in this matter is currently scheduled for June 13, 2016;
6
WHEREAS, the Pre-Trial Conference in this matter is currently scheduled for May 24, 2016;
7
WHEREAS, Replies in support of Daubert Motions are currently due on May 11, 2016 at
8 noon;
9
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a limited extension for the Replies in support of
10 Daubert Motions to May 11, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. as an accommodation to Defendants;
11
WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request the Court re-schedule the following deadline:
12
13
Original
Deadline
14
15
16
May 11, 2016 at
noon
Stipulated
Proposed New
Deadline
May 11, 2016 at
5:00 p.m.
Event
Replies in support of Daubert Motions
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the deadline for
17 Replies in support of Daubert Motions be set as stipulated and proposed in the table above.
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS
Respectfully submitted,
1
2 Dated: May 11, 2016
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
By: /s/ Hannah Lee
Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
James Hannah (SBN 237978)
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 752-1700
Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
pandre@kramerlevin.com
lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
jhannah@kramerlevin.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.
10
11
Respectfully submitted,
12
13 Dated: May 11, 2016
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
By: /s/ Jennifer Kash
Jennifer A Kash (Bar No. 203679)
Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
Sam Stake (Bar No. 257916)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com
seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com
samstake@quinnemanuel.com
Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS
1
2
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
3 document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
4
5
/s/ Peter Klivans
Peter Klivans
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
The Parties shall brief Replies in support of Daubert Motions as set forth in the May 11, 2016
4 Stipulation Regarding Replies in support of Daubert Motions .
5
6 DATED: _________________
May 12, 2016
7
___________________________
The Honorable Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?