Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc. et al

Filing 440

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 432 Stipulation Regarding Replies in Support of Daubert Motions. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
[e-mail]
LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
[e-mail]
JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
[e-mail]
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JENNIFER A KASH (Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
SEAN PAK (Bar No. 219032)
[e-mail]
IMAN LORDGOOEI (Bar No. 251320)
[e-mail]
SAM STAKE (Bar No. 257916)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

8
9
10
11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
FINJAN, INC.,

Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG

15
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

v.
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING REPLIES IN
SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS
Trial Date:

June 13, 2016

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and

1

2 Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (“Defendants,” collectively with
3 Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred in an effort to
4 agree upon a modified schedule for Replies in support of Daubert Motions :
5

WHEREAS, the trial in this matter is currently scheduled for June 13, 2016;

6

WHEREAS, the Pre-Trial Conference in this matter is currently scheduled for May 24, 2016;

7

WHEREAS, Replies in support of Daubert Motions are currently due on May 11, 2016 at

8 noon;
9

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a limited extension for the Replies in support of

10 Daubert Motions to May 11, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. as an accommodation to Defendants;
11

WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request the Court re-schedule the following deadline:

12
13

Original
Deadline

14
15
16

May 11, 2016 at
noon

Stipulated
Proposed New
Deadline
May 11, 2016 at
5:00 p.m.

Event

Replies in support of Daubert Motions

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the deadline for

17 Replies in support of Daubert Motions be set as stipulated and proposed in the table above.
18

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS

Respectfully submitted,

1
2 Dated: May 11, 2016
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

By: /s/ Hannah Lee
Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
James Hannah (SBN 237978)
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
& FRANKEL LLP
990 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff
FINJAN, INC.

10
11

Respectfully submitted,

12
13 Dated: May 11, 2016
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

By: /s/ Jennifer Kash
Jennifer A Kash (Bar No. 203679)
Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
Sam Stake (Bar No. 257916)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants
PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

23
24
25
26
27
28

2
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

3 document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
4
5

/s/ Peter Klivans
Peter Klivans

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3

The Parties shall brief Replies in support of Daubert Motions as set forth in the May 11, 2016

4 Stipulation Regarding Replies in support of Daubert Motions .
5
6 DATED: _________________
May 12, 2016
7

___________________________
The Honorable Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
__________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Case No.: 13-CV-05808-HSG
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS