Kimes v. 3GP, LLC et al
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 34 FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(1). Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/1/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2014)
4
Cris C. Vaughan, Esq., SBN 99568
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800
Loomis, CA 95650
Telephone: 916-660-9401
Facsimile: 916-660-9378
5
Attorney for Plaintiff, Martha Kimes
6
Allan J. Cory, Esq., SBN 224289
LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN J. CORY
740 4th Street
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Telephone: 707-527-8810
Facsimile: 707-569-1547
Attorney for Defendants, 3GP, LLC; G & M Productions, LLC and Gianni Messmer
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
3GP, LLC, a California limited liability company; )
)
G & M Productions, LLC, a California limited
liability company; Gianni Messmer; and Does 1- )
)
50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
Martha Kimes,
Case No.: 3:13-cv-05826-RS
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. 41 (a) (1); &
[PROPOSED]ORDER THEREON
21
STIPULATION
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that this action may be dismissed with
prejudice as to all parties; each party to bear his/its own attorneys’ fees and costs. This stipulation is
made as to the result of the settlement of the action.
Dated: November 14, 2014
27
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
By: __/s/ Cris C. Vaughan
Cris C. Vaughan
Attorney for Plaintiff
28
Stipulation for Dismissal
-1-
3:13-cv-05826-RS
1
Dated: November 25, 2014
LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN J. CORY
2
By: ___/s/ Allan J. Cory__
Allan J. Cory,
Attorney for Defendants
3
4
5
6
7
[Proposed] Order
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff in this matter is dismissed with
prejudice in its entirety.
8
9
12/1
Dated: _____________, 2014
10
________________________
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation for Dismissal
-2-
3:13-cv-05826-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?