Kimes v. 3GP, LLC et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 34 FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(1). Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/1/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2014)

Download PDF
4 Cris C. Vaughan, Esq., SBN 99568 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES 6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800 Loomis, CA 95650 Telephone: 916-660-9401 Facsimile: 916-660-9378 5 Attorney for Plaintiff, Martha Kimes 6 Allan J. Cory, Esq., SBN 224289 LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN J. CORY 740 4th Street Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Telephone: 707-527-8810 Facsimile: 707-569-1547 Attorney for Defendants, 3GP, LLC; G & M Productions, LLC and Gianni Messmer 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 3GP, LLC, a California limited liability company; ) ) G & M Productions, LLC, a California limited liability company; Gianni Messmer; and Does 1- ) ) 50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. Martha Kimes, Case No.: 3:13-cv-05826-RS STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. 41 (a) (1); & [PROPOSED]ORDER THEREON 21 STIPULATION 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto that this action may be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties; each party to bear his/its own attorneys’ fees and costs. This stipulation is made as to the result of the settlement of the action. Dated: November 14, 2014 27 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES By: __/s/ Cris C. Vaughan Cris C. Vaughan Attorney for Plaintiff 28 Stipulation for Dismissal -1- 3:13-cv-05826-RS 1 Dated: November 25, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF ALLAN J. CORY 2 By: ___/s/ Allan J. Cory__ Allan J. Cory, Attorney for Defendants 3 4 5 6 7 [Proposed] Order IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff in this matter is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 8 9 12/1 Dated: _____________, 2014 10 ________________________ United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation for Dismissal -2- 3:13-cv-05826-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?