Fortinet, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc. et al
Filing
151
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 137 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
FORTINET, INC.,
Case No. 13-cv-05831-EMC (DMR)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL
9
10
SOPHOS, INC., et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 137
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Fortinet has filed a motion to seal (Docket No. 137) which seeks to file portions of the
12
13
parties’ joint discovery letter (Docket No. 138) under seal. Fortinet notes that it does not claim
14
that the material to be sealed is confidential. However, because Sophos believes the material is
15
confidential, Fortinet brings this motion pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(e).
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e), a party must file under seal a document designated as
16
17
confidential by the opposing party or a document containing information so designated by an
18
opposing party. “Within 4 days of the filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the
19
Designating Party must file a declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that
20
all of the designated material is sealable.” Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). “If the Designating Party does
21
not file a responsive declaration as required by subsection 79-5(e)(1) and the Administrative
22
Motion to File Under Seal is denied, the Submitting Party may file the document in the public
23
record no earlier than 4 days, and no later than 10 days, after the motion is denied.” Civ. L.R. 79-
24
5(e)(2).
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
2
Sophos has not filed the respon
s
nsive declara
ation required by Civil L
Local Rule 79
9-5(e)(1)
establishing tha the materi is sealable. Accordin
at
ial
ngly, Fortine motion to seal is DE
et’s
o
ENIED.
3
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: June 18 2015
8,
___
__________
___________
__________
________
Donna M. Ryu
Un
nited States M
Magistrate J
Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?