Fortinet, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc. et al

Filing 153

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 152 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Proposed Amended Infringement Contentions filed by Fortinet, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/22/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

JOHN M. NEUKOM (SBN 275887)
[e-mail]
JORDAN R. JAFFE (SBN 254886)
[e-mail]
ANDREW M. HOLMES (SBN 260475)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC.

9
10
11

SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM (SBN 174931)
[e-mail]
KATHRYN RILEY GRASSO (SBN 211187)
[e-mail]
DAVID R. KNUDSON (SBN 265461)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 619.699.2701
TODD S. PATTERSON (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
Austin, Texas 78701-3799
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 512.457.7001
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS INC. and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS LTD.

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17

FORTINET, INC., a corporation

18

Plaintiff,
vs.

19
20

Case No. 3:13-cv-05831-EMC

SOPHOS, INC., a corporation, MICHAEL
VALENTINE, an individual, and JASON
CLARK, an individual.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER REGARDING
PROPOSED AMENDED
INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS

21
Defendants.
22
23

SOPHOS INC. and SOPHOS LTD.,
corporations,

24
Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
25
26
27

vs.
FORTINET, INC., a corporation,
Counterclaim Defendant.

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE PROPOSED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC

1

WHEREAS, pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Fortinet, Inc.

2 (“Fortinet”) seeks leave to amend its infringement contentions;
3

WHEREAS, Fortinet served proposed amended infringement contentions on May 22, 2015;

4

WHEREAS, Fortinet believes it can demonstrate the requisite “timely showing of good cause”

5 required by Patent L.R. 3-6 to amend its infringement contentions;
6

WHEREAS, pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Sophos Inc.

7 and Sophos Ltd. (collectively, “Sophos”) seek leave to amend its infringement contentions;
8

WHEREAS, Sophos served proposed amended infringement contentions on June 5, 2015;

9

WHEREAS, Sophos believes it can demonstrate the requisite “timely showing of good cause”

10 required by Patent L.R. 3-6 to amend its infringement contentions;
11

WHEREAS, Fortinet, in the spirit of compromise, has agreed not to object to Sophos’

12 proposed amended chart Exhibit A-2 served on June 5, 2015 and Exhibit A-3 served on June 5, 2015
13 and revised on June 18, 2015;
14

WHEREAS, Sophos, in the spirit of compromise, has agreed not to object to Fortinet’s

15 proposed amended infringement contentions served on May 22, 2015;
16

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, subject

17 to approval of the Court, that:
18

1) Fortinet may amend its infringement contentions, as reflected in the supplemental

19 infringement contentions served May 22, 2015;
20

2) Sophos may amend its infringement contentions, as reflected in the supplemental

21 infringement contentions charts Exhibit A-2 served on June 5, 2015 and Exhibit A-3 served on June 5,
22 2015, as revised on June 18, 2015.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE PROPOSED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC

1

DATED: June 18, 2015

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

2
3

By /s/ John M. Neukom
John M. Neukom (Bar No. 275887)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC.

8
9 DATED: June 18, 2015

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

10
11
12
13
14

By /s/ Sean C. Cunningham
SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM, Bar No. 174931
[e-mail]
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 619.699.2701

15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS INC. and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS LTD.

18
19
20

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing

21 of this document has been obtained from David Knudson.
22
/s/ Kristen E. Lovin
23
Kristen E. Lovin
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE PROPOSED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

1
2

3 FORTINET, INC., a corporation

Case No. 3:13-cv-05831-EMC

Plaintiff,

4
vs.

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
PROPOSED AMENDED
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

5
SOPHOS, INC., a corporation, MICHAEL
6 VALENTINE, an individual, and JASON
CLARK, an individual.
7
Defendants.
8
9 SOPHOS INC. and SOPHOS LTD.,
corporations,
10
Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
vs.
11
12 FORTINET, INC., a corporation,
13

Counterclaim Defendant.

14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
6/22
17 Dated: __________________, 2015 By: __________________________________
TA

O
IT IS S

OR

20

n

M. Che

LI

ER

A

H

23

RT

22

NO

21

dward
Judge E

R NIA

HONORABLE EDWARD M. DERED
CHEN

FO

19

UNIT
ED

18

RT
U
O

S

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28

3
__________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC