Fortinet, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc. et al
Filing
153
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 152 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Proposed Amended Infringement Contentions filed by Fortinet, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/22/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JOHN M. NEUKOM (SBN 275887)
johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com
JORDAN R. JAFFE (SBN 254886)
jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com
ANDREW M. HOLMES (SBN 260475)
drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC.
9
10
11
SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM (SBN 174931)
sean.cunningham@dlapiper.com
KATHRYN RILEY GRASSO (SBN 211187)
kathryn.riley@dlapiper.com
DAVID R. KNUDSON (SBN 265461)
david.knudson@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Telephone: 619.699.2700
Facsimile: 619.699.2701
TODD S. PATTERSON (pro hac vice)
todd.patterson@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
Austin, Texas 78701-3799
Telephone: 512.457.7000
Facsimile: 512.457.7001
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS INC. and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS LTD.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
FORTINET, INC., a corporation
18
Plaintiff,
vs.
19
20
Case No. 3:13-cv-05831-EMC
SOPHOS, INC., a corporation, MICHAEL
VALENTINE, an individual, and JASON
CLARK, an individual.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER REGARDING
PROPOSED AMENDED
INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS
21
Defendants.
22
23
SOPHOS INC. and SOPHOS LTD.,
corporations,
24
Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
25
26
27
vs.
FORTINET, INC., a corporation,
Counterclaim Defendant.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE PROPOSED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC
1
WHEREAS, pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Fortinet, Inc.
2 (“Fortinet”) seeks leave to amend its infringement contentions;
3
WHEREAS, Fortinet served proposed amended infringement contentions on May 22, 2015;
4
WHEREAS, Fortinet believes it can demonstrate the requisite “timely showing of good cause”
5 required by Patent L.R. 3-6 to amend its infringement contentions;
6
WHEREAS, pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Sophos Inc.
7 and Sophos Ltd. (collectively, “Sophos”) seek leave to amend its infringement contentions;
8
WHEREAS, Sophos served proposed amended infringement contentions on June 5, 2015;
9
WHEREAS, Sophos believes it can demonstrate the requisite “timely showing of good cause”
10 required by Patent L.R. 3-6 to amend its infringement contentions;
11
WHEREAS, Fortinet, in the spirit of compromise, has agreed not to object to Sophos’
12 proposed amended chart Exhibit A-2 served on June 5, 2015 and Exhibit A-3 served on June 5, 2015
13 and revised on June 18, 2015;
14
WHEREAS, Sophos, in the spirit of compromise, has agreed not to object to Fortinet’s
15 proposed amended infringement contentions served on May 22, 2015;
16
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, subject
17 to approval of the Court, that:
18
1) Fortinet may amend its infringement contentions, as reflected in the supplemental
19 infringement contentions served May 22, 2015;
20
2) Sophos may amend its infringement contentions, as reflected in the supplemental
21 infringement contentions charts Exhibit A-2 served on June 5, 2015 and Exhibit A-3 served on June 5,
22 2015, as revised on June 18, 2015.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE PROPOSED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC
1
DATED: June 18, 2015
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
2
3
By /s/ John M. Neukom
John M. Neukom (Bar No. 275887)
johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone:
(415) 875-6600
Facsimile:
(415) 875-6700
4
5
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC.
8
9 DATED: June 18, 2015
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
10
11
12
13
14
By /s/ Sean C. Cunningham
SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM, Bar No. 174931
sean.cunningham@dlapiper.com
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Telephone: 619.699.2700
Facsimile: 619.699.2701
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS INC. and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS LTD.
18
19
20
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing
21 of this document has been obtained from David Knudson.
22
/s/ Kristen E. Lovin
23
Kristen E. Lovin
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE PROPOSED AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
1
2
3 FORTINET, INC., a corporation
Case No. 3:13-cv-05831-EMC
Plaintiff,
4
vs.
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
PROPOSED AMENDED
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
5
SOPHOS, INC., a corporation, MICHAEL
6 VALENTINE, an individual, and JASON
CLARK, an individual.
7
Defendants.
8
9 SOPHOS INC. and SOPHOS LTD.,
corporations,
10
Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
vs.
11
12 FORTINET, INC., a corporation,
13
Counterclaim Defendant.
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
6/22
17 Dated: __________________, 2015 By: __________________________________
TA
O
IT IS S
OR
20
n
M. Che
LI
ER
A
H
23
RT
22
NO
21
dward
Judge E
R NIA
HONORABLE EDWARD M. DERED
CHEN
FO
19
UNIT
ED
18
RT
U
O
S
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
24
25
26
27
28
3
__________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?