Fortinet, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc. et al

Filing 338

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 337 Stipulation of Dismissal and Proposed Order filed by Fortinet, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JOHN M. NEUKOM (CA Bar No. 275887)
[e-mail]
JORDAN R. JAFFE (CA Bar No. 254886)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]

10

DANIEL B. OLMOS (CA Bar No. 235319)
[e-mail]
NOLAN, BARTON, BRADFORD, OLMOS LLP
600 University Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]

11

SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM (CA Bar No. 174931)
[e-mail]
KATHRYN RILEY GRASSO (CA Bar No.
211187)
[e-mail]
DAVID R. KNUDSON (CA Bar No. 265461)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC.

7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS INC. and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS LTD.

12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
FORTINET, INC., a corporation

Case No. 3:13-cv-05831-EMC

17
18
19
20

Plaintiff,
vs.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

SOPHOS, INC., a corporation, MICHAEL
VALENTINE, an individual, and JASON
CLARK, an individual.

Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen

21
Defendants.

22
23
24

SOPHOS INC. and SOPHOS LTD.,
corporations,

25
26
27
28

Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
vs.
FORTINET, INC., a corporation,
Counterclaim Defendant.
Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC (DMR)
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Counterclaim

2 Defendant Fortinet, Inc., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Sophos, Inc. and Sophos Ltd., and
3 Defendants Michael Valentine and Jason Clark, through their attorneys of record and subject to the
4 approval of the Court, that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims and counterclaims in
5
6

the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs,
expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

7
8 DATED: December 16, 2015

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

9
10

By /s/ John M. Neukom
John M. Neukom (Bar No. 275887)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC.

15
16

DATED: December 16, 2015

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

By /s/ Sean C. Cunningham
SEAN C. CUNNINGHAM, Bar No. 174931
[e-mail]
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 619.699.2701
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS INC. and Counterclaim
Plaintiff SOPHOS LTD.

24
25
26
27
28
1

Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC (DMR)
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1
2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing

3 of this document has been obtained from John Neukom and Sean Cunningham.
4
/s/ Miles D. Freeman __

5

Miles D. Freeman

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC (DMR)
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. All claims and counter-claims in the

2 above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees.

UNIT
ED

12/18/2015

RED

6

IT IS

R NIA

Hon. EdwardORDE
SO M. Chen

5

United States District Court Judge
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg

H

ER

LI

RT

8

FO

NO

7

9
10

A

Dated:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

4

S

3

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Case No.: 3:13-cv-05831-EMC (DMR)
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL