Fortinet, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc. et al

Filing 52

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Fortinet, Inc. filed by Fortinet, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/8/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2014)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FORTINET, INC., Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 3:13-cv-05831-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS SOPHOS INC., MICHAEL VALENTINE, , and JASON CLARK, Defendants. SOPHOS INC. and SOPHOS LTD., Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. FORTINET, INC., Counterclaim Defendant. Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ☐ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) X (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: ☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) ☐ X other requested deadline __sixty (60) days after the service of the parties’ invalidity contentions________________________________________ Dated:_4/3/2014 _/s John M. Neukom Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:_4/3/2014 /s Sean C. Cunningham Attorney for Defendants CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA UNIT ED n M. Che __________________________________ Edward Judge FO RT LI 4/8/14 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO NO Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S x ☐ ☐ A H E C RN UNITED STATES MAGISTRA JUDGE F D IS T IC T O R When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?