Kelly v. Electronic Arts, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER, Motions terminated: 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Patrick Soderlund, Andrew Wilson, Electronic Arts, Inc., Peter Ro bert Moore, Frank D. Gibeau, Blake Jorgensen, Lawrence F Probst, III. Motion Hearing set for 8/29/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/14/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ROBERT P. VARIAN (SBN 107459) Email: rvarian@orrick.com JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709) Email: jkramer@orrick.com ALEXANDER K. TALARIDES (SBN 268068) Email: atalarides@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: (415) 773-5700 Facsimile: (415) 773-5759 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants Electronic Arts, Inc., Andrew Wilson, Lawrence F. Probst III, Blake J. Jorgensen, Peter Robert Moore, Frank D. Gibeau, and Patrick Söderlund 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 In re ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 3:13-cv-05837-SI CLASS ACTION 16 This Document Relates To: 17 18 ALL ACTIONS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - (MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-CV-05837-SI) 1 WHEREAS, on December 17, 2013, Ryan Kelly filed a putative class action complaint, 2 Kelly v. Electronic Arts, Inc., No. 3:13-cv-05837 (the “Kelly Action”), against defendants 3 Electronic Arts, Inc. (“Electronic Arts”), Andrew Wilson, Blake Jorgensen, Patrick Söderlund, 4 Frank D. Gibeau, Lawrence F. Probst III, and Peter Robert Moore (collectively, “Defendants”), 5 alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of purchasers of Electronic 6 Arts common stock between July 24, 2013 and December 4, 2013 (the “Class Period”); 7 WHEREAS, on January 13, 2014, Louis Mastro filed a putative class action complaint, 8 Mastro v. Electronic Arts, Inc., No. 3:14-cv-00188 (the “Mastro Action”), against the same 9 Defendants as the Kelly Action and alleging the same claims on behalf of the same putative class; 10 WHEREAS, on January 22, 2014, the Court entered an order (the “Consolidation Order”) 11 consolidating the Kelly and Mastro Actions under the caption In re Electronic Arts, Inc. 12 Securities Litigation, Master File No. 3:13-cv-05837-SI (the “Consolidated Action”); 13 WHEREAS, on February 25, 2014, the Court entered an order pursuant to the Private 14 Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 appointing Ryan Kelly and Louis Mastro (collectively, 15 “Lead Plaintiffs”) to serve as Lead Plaintiffs in this Consolidated Action, and approved Robbins 16 Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP and Pomerantz LLP as Lead Counsel (“Lead Counsel for Lead 17 Plaintiffs and the Class”); 18 19 20 WHEREAS, on April 11, 2014, Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the “Consolidated Complaint”); WHEREAS, under the Consolidation Order, the deadline for Defendants to file their 21 motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint is May 26, 2014 (the “Motion to Dismiss Filing 22 Deadline”); 23 WHEREAS, Defendants would like to extend the Motion to Dismiss Filing Deadline by 24 two weeks, to June 9, 2014, and Lead Counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs and the Class have 25 stipulated to the requested extension; 26 WHEREAS, in order to ensure that the Parties fully address all issues thoroughly and in a 27 manner beneficial to the Court, the Parties agree that the page limits by the local rules of the 28 Court should be enlarged; 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - (MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-CV-05837-SI) 1 2 3 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between undersigned counsel, subject to approval of the Court, that: 1. The briefing schedule on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint 4 shall be as follows: 5  Defendants’ Opening Brief due: June 9, 2014 6  Lead Plaintiffs’ Opposition Brief due: July 24, 2014 7  Defendants’ Reply Brief due: August 14, 2014 8 9 10 11 12 2. The page limits for Defendants’ Opening Brief and Lead Plaintiffs’ Opposition Brief shall be as follows: Defendants’ Opening Brief shall be no longer than twenty-eight (28) pages; and Lead Plaintiffs’ Opposition Brief shall be no longer than thirty (30) pages. IT SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 12, 2014 13 14 ROBERT P. VARIAN JAMES N. KRAMER ALEXANDER K. TALARIDES Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 15 /s/ Alexander K. Talarides Alexander K. Talarides Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 18 19 20 I, Alexander K. Talarides, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Shawn Williams has concurred in this filing. 21 Dated: May 12, 2014 22 23 SHAWN WILLIAMS SAMUEL RUDMAN MARY BLASY Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd 24 25 26 /s/ Shawn Williams SHAWN WILLIAMS Co-Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - (MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-CV-05837-SI) 1 2 3 4 ORDER Based on the stipulation of the signed parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved. Hearing: 8/29/14 at 9 a.m. It is so ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 5/13/14 DATED: _______________________ THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ENLARGING PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - (MASTER FILE NO. 3:13-CV-05837-SI)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?