Bonachita v. The Capital Markets Company

Filing 23

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 5/28/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)

Download PDF
BARBARA A. LAWLESS - Bar # 53195 EMILY K. STEHR - Bar # 289624 LAWLESS & LAWLESS 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 391-7555 tlawless@lawlesssf.com estehr@lawlesssf.com Attorneys for Plaintiff RODNEY BONACHITA JOHN M. SKONBERG, Bar No. 069409 ALEXIS A. SOHRAKOFF, BarNo. 273410 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108-2693 Telephone: (415) 433-1940 Facsimile: (415) 433-8490 jskonberg@littler.com asohrakoff@1ittler.com Attorneys for Defendant THE CAPITAL MARKETS COMPANY dba CAPCO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RODNEY BONACHITA, Plaintiff, vs. THE CAPITAL MARKETS COMPANY DBA CAPCO and DOES ONE through FIFTY, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 13-05840 TEH STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Honorable Thelton E. Henderson ____________________________________________ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 13–05840 TEH -1- IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. DATED: May 22, 2014 LAWLESS & LAWLESS By: 28 DATED: May ____, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. Lawless Barbara A. Lawless Emily K. Stehr Attorneys for Plaintiff LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. /s/ Alexis A. Sohrakoff _____________________________ John M. Skonberg Alexis A. Sohrakoff Attorneys for Defendant RT A H ER erson E. Hend FO NO helton Judge T ERED R NIA O ORD IT IS S LI UNIT ED S DISTRICT TE C TA 05/28/2014 RT U O S By: N F D IS T IC T O R C ____________________________________________ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 13–05840 TEH -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?