Bonachita v. The Capital Markets Company
Filing
23
STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 5/28/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)
BARBARA A. LAWLESS - Bar # 53195
EMILY K. STEHR - Bar # 289624
LAWLESS & LAWLESS
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 391-7555
tlawless@lawlesssf.com
estehr@lawlesssf.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RODNEY BONACHITA
JOHN M. SKONBERG, Bar No. 069409
ALEXIS A. SOHRAKOFF, BarNo. 273410
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-2693
Telephone: (415) 433-1940
Facsimile: (415) 433-8490
jskonberg@littler.com
asohrakoff@1ittler.com
Attorneys for Defendant
THE CAPITAL MARKETS COMPANY dba
CAPCO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RODNEY BONACHITA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
THE CAPITAL MARKETS COMPANY
DBA CAPCO and DOES ONE through
FIFTY, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C 13-05840 TEH
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
Honorable Thelton E. Henderson
____________________________________________
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. C 13–05840 TEH
-1-
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their
designated counsel that, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), the above-captioned action be and hereby is
dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs.
DATED: May 22, 2014
LAWLESS & LAWLESS
By:
28
DATED: May ____, 2014
/s/ Barbara A. Lawless
Barbara A. Lawless
Emily K. Stehr
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
/s/ Alexis A. Sohrakoff
_____________________________
John M. Skonberg
Alexis A. Sohrakoff
Attorneys for Defendant
RT
A
H
ER
erson
E. Hend
FO
NO
helton
Judge T
ERED
R NIA
O ORD
IT IS S
LI
UNIT
ED
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA 05/28/2014
RT
U
O
S
By:
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
____________________________________________
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. C 13–05840 TEH
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?