In the Matter of the Complaint of Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District
Filing
18
ORDER re 17 Proposed Order for Second Amended Notice of Action filed by In the Matter of the Complaint of Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 9, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Rex M. Clack, Esq. (SBN 59237)
rclack@sc-law.us
David E. Russo, Esq. (SBN 112023)
drusso@sc-law.us
STERLING & CLACK
A Professional Corporation
601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2018
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 543-5300
Facsimile: (415) 543-3335
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &
TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
In the Matter of the Complaint of
)
)
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &
)
TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, as Owner
)
and Operator of the M/S SAN FRANCISCO, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
For Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability.)
)
Case No.: CV 13 5875 JST
[PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED
NOTICE OF ACTION BROUGHT FOR
EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION
OF LIABILITY
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that plaintiff GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY &
21
TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT (“plaintiff”), owner and operator of that certain vessel, the M/S
22
SAN FRANCISCO, built in or about 1974, with an approximate length of 165 feet, bearing
23
registration number 586350 (hereinafter referred to as “the M/S SAN FRANCISCO”) has, on
24
December 18, 2013, filed a complaint wherein it claims that any losses, damages, or injuries
25
allegedly occasioned, sustained, or incurred upon or in any manner arising out of the operation of
26
the M/S SAN FRANCISCO on or about its voyage on San Francisco Bay on February 16, 2013, in
27
which a small boat collided with the M/S SAN FRANCISCO and the boat’s operator was killed and
28
the passenger injured, were not the result of any negligence on plaintiff’s part or any
1
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ACTION FOR
EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
CV 13 5875 JST
1
unseaworthiness of the vessel or that any such negligence or unseaworthiness was without the
2
knowledge or privity of plaintiff. Said complaint seeks exoneration from or limitation of liability
3
for any losses, damages, or injuries allegedly occasioned, sustained, or incurred upon or in any
4
manner arising out of said voyage.
5
All persons, concerns, or firms having claims for such loss, damage, or injury must file said
6
claims, as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rule F(5) for Admiralty
7
and Maritime Claims, on or before February 19, 2014, with the Clerk of the United States District
8
Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California
9
94102, and serve on or mail a copy thereof to plaintiff’s attorneys Sterling & Clack, 601 Van Ness
10
11
Avenue, Suite 2018, San Francisco, CA 94102, Attention: Rex M. Clack, or be defaulted.
Any claimant desiring to contest the right of the plaintiff to exoneration from or limitation of
12
liability must file an answer to the said complaint with this Court, unless his claim has contained an
13
answer, and serve on or mail to plaintiff’s attorney a copy thereof on or before the date hereinabove
14
set forth, as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rule F(5) for
15
Admiralty and Maritime Claims.
16
17
9th
IT IS ORDERED this _____ day of January, 2014 at San Francisco, California.
18
19
20
HON. JON S. TIGAR
JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT
For the Northern District of California
21
22
21510113/P/LOLA/Second Amended Notice of Action
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ACTION FOR
EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
CV 13 5875 JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?