In the Matter of the Complaint of Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District

Filing 18

ORDER re 17 Proposed Order for Second Amended Notice of Action filed by In the Matter of the Complaint of Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 9, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Rex M. Clack, Esq. (SBN 59237) rclack@sc-law.us David E. Russo, Esq. (SBN 112023) drusso@sc-law.us STERLING & CLACK A Professional Corporation 601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2018 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 543-5300 Facsimile: (415) 543-3335 Attorneys for Plaintiff GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 In the Matter of the Complaint of ) ) GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY & ) TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, as Owner ) and Operator of the M/S SAN FRANCISCO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) For Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability.) ) Case No.: CV 13 5875 JST [PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ACTION BROUGHT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that plaintiff GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY & 21 TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT (“plaintiff”), owner and operator of that certain vessel, the M/S 22 SAN FRANCISCO, built in or about 1974, with an approximate length of 165 feet, bearing 23 registration number 586350 (hereinafter referred to as “the M/S SAN FRANCISCO”) has, on 24 December 18, 2013, filed a complaint wherein it claims that any losses, damages, or injuries 25 allegedly occasioned, sustained, or incurred upon or in any manner arising out of the operation of 26 the M/S SAN FRANCISCO on or about its voyage on San Francisco Bay on February 16, 2013, in 27 which a small boat collided with the M/S SAN FRANCISCO and the boat’s operator was killed and 28 the passenger injured, were not the result of any negligence on plaintiff’s part or any 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ACTION FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CV 13 5875 JST 1 unseaworthiness of the vessel or that any such negligence or unseaworthiness was without the 2 knowledge or privity of plaintiff. Said complaint seeks exoneration from or limitation of liability 3 for any losses, damages, or injuries allegedly occasioned, sustained, or incurred upon or in any 4 manner arising out of said voyage. 5 All persons, concerns, or firms having claims for such loss, damage, or injury must file said 6 claims, as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rule F(5) for Admiralty 7 and Maritime Claims, on or before February 19, 2014, with the Clerk of the United States District 8 Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 9 94102, and serve on or mail a copy thereof to plaintiff’s attorneys Sterling & Clack, 601 Van Ness 10 11 Avenue, Suite 2018, San Francisco, CA 94102, Attention: Rex M. Clack, or be defaulted. Any claimant desiring to contest the right of the plaintiff to exoneration from or limitation of 12 liability must file an answer to the said complaint with this Court, unless his claim has contained an 13 answer, and serve on or mail to plaintiff’s attorney a copy thereof on or before the date hereinabove 14 set forth, as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rule F(5) for 15 Admiralty and Maritime Claims. 16 17 9th IT IS ORDERED this _____ day of January, 2014 at San Francisco, California. 18 19 20 HON. JON S. TIGAR JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT For the Northern District of California 21 22 21510113/P/LOLA/Second Amended Notice of Action 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ACTION FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CV 13 5875 JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?