Lyon et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al

Filing 110

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 109 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS FOR BRIEFING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Audley Barrington Lyon, Jr., Edgar Cornelio, Lourdes Hernandez-Trujillo, Jose Elizandro Astorga-Cervantes.Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/25/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ROBERT P. VARIAN (SBN 107459)
CHARLES J. HA (pro hac vice)
DAVID KEENAN (pro hac vice)
JUDY KWAN (SBN 273930)
ALEXIS YEE-GARCIA (SBN 277204)
CHRISTOPHER J. SIEBENS (pro hac vice)
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2669
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
[Additional Counsel appear on signature page]

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

AUDLEY BARRINGTON LYON, JR., et. al.,
Plaintiffs,

16
v.
17
18

Case No.: 13-cv-05878 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS FOR
BRIEFING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER

19
20

UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al.,

21

CLASS ACTION

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC
OHSUSA:763990196.1

1
2
3
4

The parties to this action hereby file this Joint Stipulation for an order to set the briefing
schedule and to seek expanded page limits for the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.
The parties seek leave of court to file expanded briefs in this matter for the following reasons:
•

5

several hundred people who are housed at four separate facilities. The claims relate to

6

telephone access provided to immigration detainees at those facilities, which are served by

7

three different telephone companies. In addition, the operative facts have changed over the

8
9

course of litigation.
•

10

13
14
15
16
17

The case is legally complex. Plaintiffs are challenging the adequacy of telephone access
provided by Defendants under statutory and constitutional provisions that have not

11
12

The case is factually complex. The claims are brought on behalf of a plaintiff class of

previously been applied to similar facts.
•

The parties will seek partial summary judgment based on cross motions and will present
four rather than six briefs to the court. Because the Defendants’ opening motion and
opposition and Plaintiffs’ opposition and reply, respectively, will be combined, and
because of the complex facts and law presented, the parties’ ability to present the issues
thoroughly to the Court would be constrained if limited to the typical page limitations.

Accordingly, the Parties propose the following briefing schedule and page limits:

18
19

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

40 pages December 16, 2015

20

Defendants’ Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary
Judgment

50 pages January 5, 2016

Plaintiffs’ Opposition and Reply

30 pages January 21, 2016

Defendants’ Reply

20 pages January 28, 2016

21
22
23
24

Court Hearing on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

February 11, 2016

25
26
27
28
1
OHSUSA:763801914.1

JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

Dated: November 25, 2015

2

Respectfully submitted,
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

3
By:

4

/s/ Robert P. Varian
ROBERT P. VARIAN (SBN 107459)

5
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA
JULIA HARUMI MASS (SBN 189649)
MICHAEL T. RISHER (SBN 191627)
ANGELICA SALCEDA (SBN 296152)
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
CARL TAKEI (SBN 256229)
915 15th Street N.W., 7th Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17

VAN DER HOUT, BRIGAGLIANO, &
NIGHTINGALE, LLP
MEGAN SALLOMI (SBN 300580)
180 Sutter Street, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Main Line: [phone]
Direct Line: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

18
19
20
21
22

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

23
24
25
26
27
28

2
OHSUSA:763990196.1

JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

Dated: November 25, 2015

2
3

DISTRICT COURT SECTION
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION
CIVIL DIVISION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

4
5

WILLIAM C. PEACHEY
Director

6
7

ELIZABETH J. STEVENS
Assistant Director

8
9

By:

10
11

/s/ Katherine J. Shinners
KATHERINE J. SHINNERS
BRIAN C. WARD
JENNIFER A. BOWEN

12
Trial Attorneys
P.O Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

13
14
15
16

Attorneys For Defendants

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
OHSUSA:763990196.1

JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

5

____________________________________
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN RDERED
OO
United States District Court Judge
IT IS S

6

ard M.

NO

RT

ER

9

Chen

A

H

8

dw
Judge E

LI

7

R NIA

11/25/15
Date: ________________

UNIT
ED

4

RT
U
O

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
OHSUSA:763990196.1

JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

I hereby certify that on November 25, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing

3

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS FOR BRIEFING ON

4

CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER was served with

5

the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which provided an electronic notice and

6

electronic link of the same to all attorneys of record through the Court’s CM/ECF system.

7
8

Dated: November 25, 2015

By:

/s/ Robert P. Varian
ROBERT P. VARIAN

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
OHSUSA:763990196.1

JOINT STIPULATION
CASE NO.: 13-CV-05878 EMC