Pulley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
26
ORDER AS MODIFIED CONTINUING Case Management Conference to 6/25/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco re 24 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/27/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
RICHARD PULLEY,
Case No. 3:13-CV-05904 NC
12
Plaintiff,
U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AS MODIFIED
Current Date:
May 28, 2014
13
vs.
14
15
Defendants.
16
New Date:
____________, 2014
June 25
10:00 a.m.
2:00 p.m.
A (15th Floor)
Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins
17
18
Time:
Crtrm.:
Before:
19
[APPEARANCES BY TELEPHONE]
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
The Court, having considered the joint request by plaintiff Richard Pulley and defendants
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Wells Fargo Asset
Securities Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR2 to continue the
Case Management Conference scheduled for May 28, 2014, and finding good cause therefor,
hereby GRANTS the request and ORDERS that the Case Management Conference be continued
10:00 a.m.
to _____________________, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. on the 15th Floor of the United States District
June 25
Courthouse in San Francisco, Courtroom A.
28
55000.1014/3279017.1
3:13-CV-05904 NC
1
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
The parties’ counsel of record may appear by telephone.
2
It is so ordered.
3 Dated: May ___, 2014
27
S
UNIT
ED
RT
U
O
4
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
5
Nathanael M. Cousins RED
RDE
S SO O IED
UnitedIStates Magistrate Judge
IT
NO
8
RT
9
thanael
Judge Na
10
11
s
A
H
ER
M. Cousin
R NIA
DIF
AS MO
FO
7
LI
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.1014/3279017.1
3:13-CV-05904 NC
2
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?