Pulley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 26

ORDER AS MODIFIED CONTINUING Case Management Conference to 6/25/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco re 24 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/27/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 RICHARD PULLEY, Case No. 3:13-CV-05904 NC 12 Plaintiff, U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AS MODIFIED Current Date: May 28, 2014 13 vs. 14 15 Defendants. 16 New Date: ____________, 2014 June 25 10:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. A (15th Floor) Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins 17 18 Time: Crtrm.: Before: 19 [APPEARANCES BY TELEPHONE] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 The Court, having considered the joint request by plaintiff Richard Pulley and defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR2 to continue the Case Management Conference scheduled for May 28, 2014, and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the request and ORDERS that the Case Management Conference be continued 10:00 a.m. to _____________________, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. on the 15th Floor of the United States District June 25 Courthouse in San Francisco, Courtroom A. 28 55000.1014/3279017.1 3:13-CV-05904 NC 1 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 The parties’ counsel of record may appear by telephone. 2 It is so ordered. 3 Dated: May ___, 2014 27 S UNIT ED RT U O 4 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA 5 Nathanael M. Cousins RED RDE S SO O IED UnitedIStates Magistrate Judge IT NO 8 RT 9 thanael Judge Na 10 11 s A H ER M. Cousin R NIA DIF AS MO FO 7 LI 6 N D IS T IC T R OF C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1014/3279017.1 3:13-CV-05904 NC 2 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?