Keller v. Bechtel Construction Company et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/12/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

THOMAS M. MCINERNEY, CA State Bar No. 162055
[e-mail]
OWEN S. DALLMEYER, CA State Bar No. 287250
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendants
BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and
BECHTEL CORPORATION
MICHAEL H. KIM, CA State Bar No. 200792
[e-mail]
MICHAEL H. KIM, P.C.
475 El Camino Real, Suite 309
Millbrae, CA 94030
Telephone:
650.697.8899
Facsimile:
650.697.8896
Attorney for Plaintiff
DANNY KELLER

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18

DANNY KELLER,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22
23

v.
BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY;
BECHTEL CORPORATION; and DOES 1
through 100,

Case No. 3:13-cv-05915-TEH
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT
TO FRCP 41(A)(1) AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Complaint Filed: October 28, 2013
Trial Date:
May 12, 2015

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:13-cv-05915-TEH
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

STIPULATION

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their

3

designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice

4

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).

5
6

Dated: November 11, 2014

/s/ Michael H. Kim
Michael H. Kim
Counsel for Plaintiff
Danny Keller

Dated: November 11, 2014

/s/ Thomas M. McInerney
Thomas M. McInerney
Counsel for Defendants
Bechtel Construction Company and
Bechtel Corporation

7
8
9
10
11

.

12
13
14

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

15

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

16

document has been obtained from the other signatories.

17

Dated: November 11, 2014

18

By: /s/ Thomas M. McInerney
Thomas M. McInerney

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 3:13-cv-05915-TEH
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

IT IS SO ORDERED

8

S

THE HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON
JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES
son
DISTRICT COURT E. Hender
lton
he
Judge T

ER

H

11

, 2014

RT

10

11/12

NO

9

DATED:

R NIA

7

UNIT
ED

6

RT
U
O

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

4

cause appearing, this action is dismissed with prejudice.

LI

3

The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good

A

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

19379040.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 3:13-cv-05915-TEH
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER