Dana Rhinerson, et al -v- Van's International Foods, Inc.

Filing 55

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 53 Motion to Continue the Case Management Conference.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: + 1 (650) 463-4000 Facsimile: + 1 (650) 463-4199 robert.hawk@hoganlovells.com Benjamin T. Diggs (Bar No. 245904) James N. Tansey (Bar No. 293332) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 3 Embarcadero Ctr., 15th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: + 1 (415) 374-2300 Facsimile: + 1 (415) 374-2499 benjamin.diggs@hoganlovells.com james.tansey@hoganlovells.com Attorneys for Defendant VAN’S INTERNATIONAL FOODS, INC. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 Case No. 3:13-cv-05923-VC 15 16 DANA RHINERSON, and AIDIN MORADI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiffs, 18 v. 19 20 VAN’S INTERNATIONAL FOODS, INC., 21 Defendant 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OGAN L OVEL LS US LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW MENLO PAR K [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05923-VC 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant Van’ International Foods, Inc.’s motion to continue the Case Management Conference having been duly considered by this Court; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted. The Case Management 5 Conference shall be continued until August 26, 2014. The Parties’ Joint Case Management 6 Statement shall be filed on or before August 19, 2014. S July 17, 2014 Dated: ___________________ TED GRAN By: RT ER H 12 J nce Ch u d g e Vi 13 habr ia FO NO 11 LI 10 R NIA VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge A 9 UNIT ED 8 RT U O 7 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OGAN L OVEL LS US LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW MENLO PAR K -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05923-VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?