Dana Rhinerson, et al -v- Van's International Foods, Inc.
Filing
55
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 53 Motion to Continue the Case Management Conference.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: + 1 (650) 463-4000
Facsimile: + 1 (650) 463-4199
robert.hawk@hoganlovells.com
Benjamin T. Diggs (Bar No. 245904)
James N. Tansey (Bar No. 293332)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
3 Embarcadero Ctr., 15th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: + 1 (415) 374-2300
Facsimile: + 1 (415) 374-2499
benjamin.diggs@hoganlovells.com
james.tansey@hoganlovells.com
Attorneys for Defendant
VAN’S INTERNATIONAL FOODS, INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
Case No. 3:13-cv-05923-VC
15
16
DANA RHINERSON, and AIDIN
MORADI, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Plaintiffs,
18
v.
19
20
VAN’S INTERNATIONAL FOODS,
INC.,
21
Defendant
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
MENLO PAR K
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05923-VC
1
2
3
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant Van’ International Foods, Inc.’s motion to continue the Case Management
Conference having been duly considered by this Court;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted. The Case Management
5
Conference shall be continued until August 26, 2014. The Parties’ Joint Case Management
6
Statement shall be filed on or before August 19, 2014.
S
July 17, 2014
Dated: ___________________
TED
GRAN
By:
RT
ER
H
12
J
nce Ch
u d g e Vi
13
habr ia
FO
NO
11
LI
10
R NIA
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
A
9
UNIT
ED
8
RT
U
O
7
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
MENLO PAR K
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05923-VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?