Jakosalem v. Air Serv Corporation

Filing 50

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT TO OCTOBER 2, 2015 AT 9:30 A.M. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/2/2015)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

MARIO JAKOSALEM,

Case No. 13-cv-05944-SI

Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
8

AIR SERV CORPORATION,
Defendant.

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON
FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS
SETTLEMENT TO OCTOBER 2, 2015
AT 9:30 A.M.

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

On May 4, 2015 the Court granted plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for preliminary approval

12

of class action settlement. Docket No. 41. On August 13, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion for final

13

approval of class settlement, scheduled for a hearing on September 18, 2015. Docket No. 46.

14

However, in their motion for final approval, plaintiffs acknowledge that the Class Action

15

Fairness Act (“CAFA”) notice was not sent out in a timely fashion. While defendant should have

16

notified the appropriate state and government officials by April 11, 2015, notice was not sent out

17
until July 2, 2015. Mot. at 15.
18
19

CAFA requires that “no later than 10 days after a proposed settlement,” all defendants

20

participating in the settlement must notify “the appropriate State official of each State in which a

21

class member resides and the appropriate Federal official, a notice of the proposed settlement

22

consisting of,” inter alia, “any proposed or final class action settlement.” 28 U.S.C. § 1715(b)(4).

23

“An order giving final approval of a proposed settlement may not be issued earlier than 90 days

24

after the later of the dates on which the appropriate Federal official and the appropriate State

25
26
27
28

official are served with the notice required under subsection (b).” Id. §1715(d). “A class member
may refuse to comply with and may choose not to be bound by a settlement agreement or consent
decree in a class action if the class member demonstrates that the notice required under subsection

1

(b) has not been provided.” Id. §1715(e)(1).

2

“According to the legislative history, Section 1715(b) was included as a means to

3

‘safeguard plaintiff class members’ rights,’ by providing state and federal officials with an

4

opportunity to ‘voice concerns if they believe that the class action settlement is not in the best

5

interest of their citizens.’” Steinfeld v. Discovery Financial Services, No. C 12-01118 JSW, 2014

6
7

WL 1309352, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2014) (internal citations omitted). Courts have found that
CAFA’s notice requirements have been substantially complied with when the relevant state and

8
9

federal officials have had 90 days to review the proposed settlement, even when notice was sent
out late. See Adoma v. Univ. of Phoenix, Inc., 913 F. Supp. 2d 964, 972-93 (E.D. Cal. 2012); D.S.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

ex rel. S.S. v. New York City Dep't of Educ., 255 F.R.D. 59, 80 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).

12
13
14

Defendants served the CAFA notice on July 2, 2015; 90 days from that date is September
30, 2015. Plaintiffs propose proceeding with the hearing as scheduled on September 18, 2015, and,
if the settlement is to be approved, simply waiting until September 30, 2015 to issue an order to

15
16
17
18

that effect. However, the Court finds that the interests of justice would be better served by having
the fairness hearing after the 90 day period has expired. Accordingly, the Court reschedules the
hearing for final approval of class settlement to October 2, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.

19

The Court recognizes that the notice sent to class members listed the date of the hearing as

20

September 18, 2015. To date, no objections have been made to the proposed settlement. However,

21

in the event that any class members or objectors come to the courthouse on September 18, 2015,

22
the Court will advise those persons that the hearing has been rescheduled to October 2, 2015.
23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 2, 2015
________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge

26
27
28
2