Estes v. The Regents of the University of California et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by The Regents of the University of California filed by The Regents of the University of California. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 9, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
¥
¥
©
¨
§
¦
¥
¡
¤
¡
£
£
¢
¡
v.
CASE NO. ______________________
¦
¡
,
Plaintiff(s),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
¡
¦
¢
¥
¦
¡
¡
£
¡
¦
,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
$
¢
#
"
!
¢
¤
¦
¥
£
¡
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
✔
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
0
(
&
5
)
'
%
&
(
4
0
3
0
1
2
(
1
0
)
(
'
&
%
'
2
(
&
)
7
0
6
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
✔
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
9
Dated:___________
____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:____________
____________________________
Attorney for Defendant
¡
¦
¡
!
¡
¥
£
A
"
$
¡
@
@
"
B
8
8
§
§
9
9
¨
¨
9
9
8
8
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
UNIT
ED
ERED
"
£
IT
R NIA
RD
__________________________________
IS SO O
¦
¦
¥
"
C
Dated: May 9, 2014
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
¡
XX
9
9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A
H
LI
RT
ER
. Ti ga r
FO
NO
nS
J u d ge J o
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?