Hunt v. Continental Casualty Company

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 , Settlement Conference continued to 8/18/2014 at 11:00 AM. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 06/16/2014. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Charles M. Louderback (SBN 88788) clouderback@louderbackgroup.com Stacey L. Pratt (SBN 124892) spratt@louderbackgroup.com LOUDERBACK LAW GROUP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2970 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 615-0200 Facsimile: (415) 233-4775 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN HUNT 7 8 9 10 11 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Camille A. Olson (SBN 111919) colson@seyfarth.com Richard B. Lapp (SBN 271052) rlapp@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 131 South Dearborn Street, Suite 2400 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: (312) 460-5000 Facsimile: (312) 460-7914 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Cassandra H. Carroll (SBN 209123) ccarroll@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 Attorneys for Defendant CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 SUSAN HUNT, 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, an ) Illinois Corporation, and DOES 1 through 30, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 3:13-CV-05966-WHO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Date: June 23, 2014 Time: 11:00 a.m. Courtroom: _4_____ Judge: Magistrate Kandis A. Westmore 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:13-cv-05966-WHO Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, Plaintiff Susan Hunt (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Continental 1 2 Casualty Company (“CNA”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned 3 counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 4 5 WHEREAS, an early settlement conference is currently scheduled in this matter for June 23, 2014, at 11:00 am; 6 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to conduct limited depositions prior to the early 7 settlement conference in this case, which they believe are necessary to evaluate the case for 8 purposes of settlement, and due to scheduling conflicts, will not complete those depositions 9 before the scheduled early settlement conference, and anticipate completing these depositions 10 during the month of July, 2014; 11 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the interests of justice would be promoted by 12 continuing the early settlement conference until the week of August 4, 2014, or a date thereafter 13 that is convenient for the Court. The Parties are available on either August 4, 2014 or August 5, 14 2014. 15 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO STIPULATE AND RESPECTFULLY 16 REQUEST THAT THE COURT ORDER that the early settlement conference scheduled for 17 June 23, 2014 be continued to August 4, 2014, or August 5, 2014. 18 19 20 21 22 LOUDERBACK LAW GROUP DATED: June 12, 2014 By: /s/ Charles M. Louderback Charles M. Louderback Stacey L. Pratt Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN HUNT 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:13-cv-05966-WHO 1 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP DATED: June 12, 2014 2 By: 3 4 5 6 /s/ Cassandra H. Carroll Camille A. Olson Richard B. Lapp Cassandra H. Carroll Attorneys for Defendant CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY 7 8 ORDER 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the early settlement 10 11 12 18 conference currently set for June, 2014 shall be rescheduled for August _____, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. 13 14 16 DATED: June ____, 2014 __________________________________ HON. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:13-cv-05966-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?