Google, Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Inc. et al
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Google Inc. to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Google, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 19, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
PARKER C. ANKRUM (SBN: 261608)
pankrum@kasowitz.com
REBECCA UNRUH (SBN: 267881)
runruh@kasowitz.com
KEITH J. MITRO (SBN: 287108)
kmitro@kasowitz.com
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 453-5170
Facsimile: (650) 453-5171
COURTLAND L. REICHMAN (SBN: 268873)
creichman@mckoolsmith.com
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 394-1400
Facsimile: (650) 394-1422
Attorneys for Defendants
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS OF
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
JEFFREY J. TONEY (pro hac vice)
jtoney@kasowitz.com
JONATHAN K. WALDROP (pro hac vice)
jwaldrop@kasowitz.com
DARCY L. JONES (pro hac vice)
djones@kasowitz.com
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
1349 West Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 1500
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: (404) 260-6133
Facsimile: (404) 260-6081
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOOGLE INC.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
GOOGLE INC.,
Case No. 13-CV-05997-JST
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
23
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
GOOGLE INC. TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
-1CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”) and
Defendants Eolas Technologies Incorporated and The Regents of the University of California
(collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as
follows:
WHEREAS, on January 2, 2014 and January 3, 2014, Google served its complaint upon
Defendants;
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2014, at the request of Defendants, the parties agreed to
mutual 14 day extensions for Defendants to respond to Google’s complaint and for Google to
respond to Defendants’ pleadings or response to Google’s complaint to which a response is
allowed;
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for
Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Google’s complaint to February 7, 2014;
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2014, this Court granted the parties stipulation;
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction in response to Google’s complaint;
WHEREAS, Google’s response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
is due February 21, 2014;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ reply is due February 28, 2014; and
WHEREAS, this Court has set a hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction for March 20, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
NOW THEREFORE the parties through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and
request that the Court grant, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 that:
24
25
jurisdiction be extended until March 7, 2014;
26
27
The time to file Google’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of
The time to file the Defendants’ reply to Google’s opposition be extended until
March 14, 2014; and
The hearing for the Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
-1CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST
1
2
noticed for April 3, 2014, or as soon thereafter at the Court’s convenience.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
3
4
Dated: February 17, 2014
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
5
6
By: /s/ Keith J. Mitro_____________
KEITH J. MITRO (SBN: 287108)
kmitro@kasowitz.com
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 453-5170
Facsimile: (650) 453-5171
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOOGLE INC., INC.
11
12
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
13
14
Dated: February 17, 2014
15
16
17
18
By: /s/ Courtland L. Reichman______
COURTLAND LEWIS REICHMAN
(SBN 268873)
creichman@mckoolsmith.com
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN PC
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 394-1400
Facsimile: (650) 394-1422
19
Attorneys for Defendants
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED;
and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
22
23
24
I hereby attest pursuant to L.R. 5.1(i)(3) that concurrence in the electronic filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatories.
25
26
Dated: February 17, 2014
27
_/s/ Keith J. Mitro__________________
Keith J. Mitro
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
-2CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST
1
The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, orders as follows:
4
jurisdiction be extended until March 7, 2014;
6
7
8
9
The time to file the Defendants’ reply to Google’s opposition be extended until March
14, 2014; and
The hearing for the Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be noticed
for April 3, 2014, or as soon thereafter at the Court’s convenience.
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
S
Dated: ______________, 2014
February 19
13
14
UNIT
ED
12
Honorable Jon S. TigarERED
RD
IS SO O
ITStates District Judge
United
NO
15
RT
16
RT
U
O
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
n
J u d ge J o
ER
18
S . Ti ga r
A
H
17
R NIA
5
The time to file Google’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of
FO
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
LI
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
-3CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?