Google, Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Inc. et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Google Inc. to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Google, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 19, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

PARKER C. ANKRUM (SBN: 261608)
[e-mail]
REBECCA UNRUH (SBN: 267881)
[e-mail]
KEITH J. MITRO (SBN: 287108)
[e-mail]
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

COURTLAND L. REICHMAN (SBN: 268873)
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS OF
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY J. TONEY (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JONATHAN K. WALDROP (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DARCY L. JONES (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
1349 West Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 1500
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOOGLE INC.

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
GOOGLE INC.,

Case No. 13-CV-05997-JST

20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
23

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
GOOGLE INC. TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

-1CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”) and
Defendants Eolas Technologies Incorporated and The Regents of the University of California
(collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as
follows:
WHEREAS, on January 2, 2014 and January 3, 2014, Google served its complaint upon
Defendants;
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2014, at the request of Defendants, the parties agreed to
mutual 14 day extensions for Defendants to respond to Google’s complaint and for Google to
respond to Defendants’ pleadings or response to Google’s complaint to which a response is
allowed;
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for
Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Google’s complaint to February 7, 2014;
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2014, this Court granted the parties stipulation;
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction in response to Google’s complaint;
WHEREAS, Google’s response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
is due February 21, 2014;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ reply is due February 28, 2014; and
WHEREAS, this Court has set a hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction for March 20, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
NOW THEREFORE the parties through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and
request that the Court grant, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 that:


24
25

jurisdiction be extended until March 7, 2014;


26
27

The time to file Google’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of

The time to file the Defendants’ reply to Google’s opposition be extended until
March 14, 2014; and



The hearing for the Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be

28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

-1CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST

1
2

noticed for April 3, 2014, or as soon thereafter at the Court’s convenience.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3
4
Dated: February 17, 2014

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

5
6

By: /s/ Keith J. Mitro_____________
KEITH J. MITRO (SBN: 287108)
[e-mail]
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOOGLE INC., INC.

11
12

MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.

13
14

Dated: February 17, 2014

15
16
17
18

By: /s/ Courtland L. Reichman______
COURTLAND LEWIS REICHMAN
(SBN 268873)
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN PC
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

19

Attorneys for Defendants
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED;
and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22
23
24

I hereby attest pursuant to L.R. 5.1(i)(3) that concurrence in the electronic filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatories.

25
26

Dated: February 17, 2014

27

_/s/ Keith J. Mitro__________________
Keith J. Mitro

28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

-2CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST

1

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, orders as follows:


4

jurisdiction be extended until March 7, 2014;


6
7
8
9

The time to file the Defendants’ reply to Google’s opposition be extended until March
14, 2014; and



The hearing for the Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be noticed
for April 3, 2014, or as soon thereafter at the Court’s convenience.

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

S
Dated: ______________, 2014
February 19

13
14

UNIT
ED

12

Honorable Jon S. TigarERED
RD
IS SO O
ITStates District Judge
United

NO

15

RT

16

RT
U
O

11

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

n
J u d ge J o

ER

18

S . Ti ga r

A

H

17

R NIA

5

The time to file Google’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of

FO

3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

LI

2

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

-3CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST