Google, Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Inc. et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 13, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

COURTLAND L. REICHMAN (SBN: 268873)
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED;
and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA

7

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
JEFFREY J. TONEY (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JONATHAN K. WALDROP (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DARCY L. JONES (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]

8
9

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

10

1349 West Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 1500
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
225 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065

PARKER C. ANKRUM (SBN: 261608)
[e-mail]
REBECCA UNRUH (SBN: 267881)
[e-mail]
KEITH J. MITRO (SBN: 287108)
[e-mail]

13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOOGLE INC.

14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS OF )
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
GOOGLE INC.,

Case No. 3:13-cv-05997-JST
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (D.I. 29)

25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
McKool 973634v1

1

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05997-JST

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”) and Defendants

2

Eolas Technologies Incorporated and The Regents of the University of California (collectively,

3
4

“Defendants”) hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:
WHEREAS, on January 2, 2014 and January 3, 2014, Google served its complaint upon

5
6
7

Defendants;
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2014, at the request of Defendants, the parties agreed to mutual

8

14 day extensions for Defendants to respond to Google’s complaint and for Google to respond to

9

Defendants’ pleadings or response to Google’s complaint to which a response is allowed;

10
11

WHEREAS, on January 24, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for
Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Google’s complaint to February 7, 2014;

12
McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
225 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065

WHEREAS, on January 24, 2014, this Court granted the parties stipulation;
13
14
15

WHEREAS, on February 7, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction in response to Google’s complaint;

16

WHEREAS, on February 27, 2014, the parties filed a joint stipulation to extend deadlines

17

for: 1) Google to respond to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction to March 7, 2014;

18

2) Defendants to reply to Google’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of

19

jurisdiction to March 14, 2014; and 3) the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of

20
jurisdiction be noticed for April 3, 2014, or as soon thereafter at the Court’s convenience;
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

WHEREAS, this Court set a hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction for April 3, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.; and
WHEREAS, on March 7, 2014, Google filed its opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss
for lack of jurisdiction.
NOW THEREFORE the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and
request that the Court grant, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, that the time for Defendants to reply to
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
McKool 973634v1

2

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05997-JST

1

Google’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be extended by three

2

days to March 17, 2014.

3

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

4
Dated this March 13, 2014.

MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.

5
By: /s/ Courtland L. Reichman
COURTLAND LEWIS REICHMAN
(SBN 268873)
[e-mail]
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Defendants EOLAS
TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED; and THE
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA

11

McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
225 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065

12
13
Dated this March 13, 2014.

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

14
By: /s/ Keith J. Mitro
KEITH J. MITRO (SBN: 287108)
[e-mail]
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15
16
17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOOGLE INC.

19
20
21
22
23

I hereby attest pursuant to L.R. 5.1(i)(3) that concurrence in the electronic filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatories.
Dated this March 13, 2014.

24

/s/ Courtland L. Reichman
Courtland L. Reichman

25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
McKool 973634v1

3

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05997-JST

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, orders that the time for

3

Defendants to reply to Google’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

5

is extended by three days to until March 17, 2014.
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

S
March 13
Dated: ________________, 2014

9

UNIT
ED

8

RT
U
O

7

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

______________________________
Honorable Jon S. TigarRED
RDE
UnitedIStates District Judge
S SO O

IT

R NIA

4

10

McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
225 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065

ER

14

A

H

13

S . Ti ga r

LI

RT

12

n
J u d ge J o

FO

NO

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
McKool 973634v1

4

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-05997-JST