Google, Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Inc. et al

Filing 99

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 98 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 97 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion for Leave to File; -Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Dismiss Action filed by Google, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 4, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JONATHAN K. WALDROP (SBN: 297903)
[e-mail]
DARCY L. JONES (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ROBERT P. WATKINS III (SBN: 298571)
[e-mail]
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

JEFFREY J. TONEY (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
1349 West Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 1500
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
GOOGLE INC.

13

COURTLAND L. REICHMAN (SBN: 268873)
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
KEVIN L. BURGESS (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JOHN B. CAMPBELL (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
J.R. JOHNSON, II (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER A. ALBERT (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JOSHUA W. BUDWIN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: [phone];
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS OF
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
GOOGLE INC.,

Case No. 13-CV-05997-JST

20
Plaintiff,
21

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION

v.
22
23

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; and
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA,

24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO DISMISS ACTION

CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and Local Rules 7-1 and 7-12, Plaintiff Google
Inc. (“Google”) and Defendants Eolas Technologies Incorporated (“Eolas”) and The Regents of
the University of California (the “Regents”) (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate through
their respective counsel of record as follows:
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2014, the Court entered an Order (Dkt. 97) on Defendants’
then-pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkts. 77, 78 and 84), granting the Motion to Dismiss in part;
WHEREAS, in the Court’s November 17, 2014 Order, the Court dismissed without
prejudice Google’s claims of non-infringement of the patents-in-suit; dismissed with prejudice
Defendants’ counterclaims of infringement, including direct and indirect infringement, of the
patents-in-suit against Google; and dismissed with prejudice any and all claims of infringement,
including direct and indirect infringement, of the patents-in-suit that Eolas or the Regents has or
may have in the future, including any claims of past, present or future infringement of the patentsin-suit against: (a) Google; (b) any Google affiliates; and/or (c) any users, customers, or Google
partners with respect to Google products and/or services (including but not limited to services,
components, hardware, software, websites, processes, machines, manufactures, and any
combinations and components thereof, that are designed, developed, sold, licensed, or made, in
whole or substantial part, by or on behalf of Google);
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to dismiss and to close the above-captioned Action;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, by and between
Defendants and Google through their designated counsel, that:


22
23
24

This Action shall be dismissed pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting in Part
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 97);



The Clerk shall close the case.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO DISMISS ACTION

-1-

CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST

1

Dated: December 03, 2014

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

2
By: /s/ Robert P. Watkins III________
ROBERT P. WATKINS III
(SBN: 298571)
[e-mail]
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES
&FRIEDMAN LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8

Attorney for Plaintiff
GOOGLE INC.

9
10
Dated: December 03, 2014
11

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

12

By: /s/ J.R. Johnson, II___________
J.R. JOHNSON, II (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: [phone];
Facsimile: [phone]

13
14
15
16

Attorney for Defendants
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED; and
THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

I hereby attest pursuant to L.R. 5.1(i)(3) that concurrence in the electronic filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatories.
Dated: December 03, 2014

24

/s/ Robert P. Watkins III_________________
Robert P. Watkins III

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO DISMISS ACTION

-2-

CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST

1
2
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court having considered the stipulation of the Parties, orders as follows:


4
5
6

This Action is dismissed pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting in Part
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 97);



The Clerk is instructed to close the case.

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

December 4
Dated: ______________, 2014
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO DISMISS ACTION

-3-

CASE NO. 13-CV-05997-JST