Computer Sciences Corporation v. Alan Razavi, et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING re 20 Notice (Other)/Stipulation to Extend Time For Defendants to Respond to Complaint filed by Computer Sciences Corporation. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/3/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

JAMES W. SOONG, Cal. Bar No. 196092
[e-mail]
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
379 Lytton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301-1479
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.815.2601
LAURA L. CHAPMAN, Cal. Bar No. 167249
[e-mail]
LAI L. YIP, Cal. Bar No. 258029
[e-mail]
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.434.3947
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
COMAR LAW
D. Inder Comar (SBN 243732)
[e-mail]
901 Mission Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: +1.415.513.0445
Attorneys for Defendants
BIZCLOUD, INC., ZIPBUSINESS and VAHID RAZAVI

17
18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21
22

COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION,
a Nevada Corporation,

Civil Action No. 13-cv-05999-JSC
Assigned to the Hon. Joseph C. Spero

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT

23
24

v.

25

ALAN RAZAVI, an individual, VAHID
RAZAVI, an individual, BIZCLOUD, INC., a
Wyoming Corporation, ZIPBUSINESS, a
California Corporation, and DOES 1 – 10.

26
27

[Local Rule 6-1(a)]
Complaint Filed: December 30, 2013

Defendants.

28
-1SMRH:416497796.1

Case No. 13-cv-1599-JSC

1

TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT AND ALL INTERESTED

2 PARTIES:
3

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff Computer Sciences Corporation

4 and Defendants Bizcloud, Inc. (“BCI”), Zipbusiness and Vahid Razavi, through their respective
5 counsel of record.
6
7

RECITALS
1.

WHEREAS this action was filed by Plaintiff Computer Sciences Corporation

8 (“Plaintiff”) on December 30, 2013, against Defendants Alan Razavi, Vahid Razavi, Bizcloud,
9 Inc. and Zipbusiness;
10
2.

WHEREAS Defendant BCI was served with the summons and complaint in this

11
12
13
14

action on January 16, 2014 and therefore its original deadline to respond to the complaint is
February 6, 2014;
3.

WHEREAS Defendant ZipBusiness was served with the summons and complaint

15 in this action on January 15, 2014 and therefore its original deadline to respond to the complaint is
16 February 5, 2014;
17
18

4.

WHEREAS Defendant Vahid Razavi was served with the summons and complaint

in this action on January 16, 2014 and therefore his original deadline to respond to the complaint

19
20
21

is February 6, 2014;
5.

WHEREAS to date, Defendant Alan Razavi has not been served with the summons

22 and complaint in this action;
23

6.

WHEREAS Defendants BCI, ZipBusiness, and Vahid Razavi (“Stipulating

24 Defendants”) have requested an extension of time to file a responsive pleading, until March 7,
25
2014, which Plaintiff has agreed to grant;

26
7.

WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications in the case and the

27
28

stipulated extension will have no effect on the schedule for the case;

-2SMRH:416497796.1

Case No. 13-cv-1599-JSC

1

8.

WHEREAS, pursuant Local Rule 6-1(a), no Court order is required.

2
STIPULATION

3
4

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and the

5 Stipulating Defendants, through their counsel, to extend the deadline for the Stipulating
6 Defendants to file a responsive pleading as to the Complaint to March 7, 2014.
7

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

8
9

January 31, 2014

10

Respectfully submitted,
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON

LLP

11
By:

12
13
14

/s/ Laura L. Chapman
JAMES W. SOONG
LAURA L. CHAPMAN
LAI L. YIP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION

15
16

January 31, 2014

Respectfully submitted,
COMAR LAW

17
18

By:

19
20

/s/ D. Inder Comar
D. Inder Comar
Attorneys for Defendants
VAHID RAZAVI,
BIZCLOUD, INC. and ZIPBUSINESS

21
22

I hereby attest that all signatories listed above, and on whose behalf this filing is submitted,

23 concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing as indicated by a conformed signature
24 (/S/) within this e-filed document.
25
26
27
28
-3SMRH:416497796.1

Case No. 13-cv-1599-JSC

1 Dated: January 31, 2014
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON

2
3

By

/s/ Laura L. Chapman
JAMES W. SOONG
LAURA L. CHAPMAN
LAI L. YIP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION

4
5
6

RT

11

Judge Jo

12

pero

S
seph C.

A

H

ER

ERED

LI

DAted: Feb. 3, 2014

NO

10

O ORD

IT IS S

R NIA

S
UNIT
ED

9

RT
U
O

8

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

FO

7

LLP

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4SMRH:416497796.1

Case No. 13-cv-1599-JSC