J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Inc. et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 23, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Courtland L. Reichman, SBN 2668873 MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C. 255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Tel: (650) 394-1400; Fax: (650) 394-1422 creichman@mckoolsmith.com Attorneys for Defendants Eolas Technologies Incorporated And the Regents of the University of California 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 J. C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Plaintiff, 255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C. 11 12 13 14 vs. EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:13-cv-06003-HRL STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 18 19 Defendants Eolas Technologies Incorporated and the Regents of the University of 20 California (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“JCPenney”) 21 hereby stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), to extend the deadline for Defendants to answer 22 or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 14 days to February 7, 2014. 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I hereby attest that concurrence in 24 the filing of this document has been obtained for the other signatories in this e-filed document. 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:13-cv-06003-HRL 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 1 DATED: January 23, 2014 MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C. 2 By /s/ Courtland L. Reichman Courtland L. Reichman 3 4 Attorneys for Defendants EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY 5 6 7 DATED: January 23, 2014 8 J. C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. By /s/ Derek B. Lipscombe_____ Derek B. Lipscombe 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff J. C. PENNY CORPORATION, INC. 10 255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C. 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: _______________________ January 23, 2014 ______________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 5:13-cv-06003-HRL 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?