Obodai v. Indeed, Inc.

Filing 9

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' REQUESTS TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT MARCH 21, 2013 MOTION HEARING re 8 Letter filed by Indeed, Inc. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/12/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (sisS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 United States District Court Northern District of California 3 4 5 6 AUSTIN OBODAI (d/b/a Heptad), Plaintiff, 7 8 v. 9 Case No.: CV 13-80027-EMC (KAW) ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ REQUESTS TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT MARCH 21, 2013 MOTION HEARING INDEED, INC., 10 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On March 5, 2013, Plaintiff Austin Obodai submitted a request to appear telephonically at 13 the March 21, 2013 hearing on his motion to quash Defendant Indeed, Inc.’s subpoena on Google, 14 Inc. On March 7, 2013, Defendant submitted a letter also requesting to appear telephonically. 15 (See Dkt. No. 8.) 16 The Court GRANTS both parties’ requests to appear telephonically at the March 21, 2013 17 motion hearing. The parties are ordered to comply with the Court’s Standing Order on 18 Procedures for Telephonic Appearances, available online at http://cand.uscourts.gov/kaworders. 19 This includes personally arranging the telephonic appearance with CourtCall—a paid, private 20 service—in advance of the hearing date. 21 22 23 24 The parties are advised that, in the future, proposed orders must be submitted with all moving papers, including requests to appear by telephone. See Civil L.R. 7-2(c). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 12, 2013 25 26 27 28 KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?