Brinskele v. The United States
Filing
10
FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SERVICE OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Show Cause Response due by 9/3/2013.Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 8/27/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
EDWARD BRINSKELE,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. 13-MISC-80094 JSW
v.
FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE RE SERVICE OF
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
/
14
15
On July 3, 2013, Magistrate Judge Ryu issued a Report and Recommendation in which
16
she recommended granting the United States of America’s Application for a Writ of
17
Garnishment. Any objections to the Report and Recommendation would have been due 14 days
18
after a party was served with the Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); N.D.
19
Civ. L.R. 72-2.
20
Because it was not clear to the Court that the United States served a copy of the Report
21
and Recommendation on: (1) the debtor or (2) the Garnishee, on August 12, 2013, the Court
22
issued an Order to Show Cause directing the United States to show cause why service should
23
not be effected before the Court rules on the pending Report and Recommendation. To clarify,
24
the Court intended that the United States show cause why service of the Report and
25
Recommendation should not have been made on both the debtor and the Garnishee. The Court
26
ordered that the United States’ response would due by August 23, 2013, unless it files a proof of
27
service prior to that date.
28
On August 16, 2013, the United States filed a proof of service, in which it stated that, on
August 8, 2013, it had served the Order of Referral, the Amended Order of Referral, and the
1
Report and Recommendation Re Application for Writ of Garnishment on the Garnishee by
2
United States Mail. Accordingly, any objections to the Report and Recommendation by the
3
Garnishee would have been due on August 26, 2013.
4
5
6
The United States also certified that, on August 16, 2013, it served a copy of the Order
to Show Cause on the debtor and the Garnishee, as required by the Court.
The United States has not, however, responded to the Court’s Order to Show Cause why
provided proof of service that the Debtor has been served with a copy of that document.
9
Accordingly, the Court shall provide the United States with one final opportunity to respond to
10
the Order to Show Cause as to why service of the Report and Recommendation should not be
11
For the Northern District of California
service of the Report and Recommendation should not be served on the Debtor. It also has not
8
United States District Court
7
made on the Debtor. The United States’ response shall be due by September 3, 2013.
12
Alternatively, by that date, the United States may file a further proof of service showing that it
13
has served the debtor.
14
At that time, the Court will rule on the Report and Recommendation.
15
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall serve a copy of this Order on all
16
17
18
interested parties and shall file proof of such service by no later than September 3, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 27, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?