Mishon de Reya New York LLP v. Grail Semiconductor

Filing 3

ORDER GRANTING 2 Consent MOTION to Substitute Attorney. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/10/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)

Download PDF
AO 154 (10/03) Substitution of Attorney UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN Mishcon de Reya New York LLP Plaintiff (s), District of CALIFORNIA CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY V. Grail Semiconductor, Inc. CASE NUMBER: 3:13-mc-80107-JSW Defendant (s), Notice is hereby given that, subject to approval by the court, Mishcon de Reya New York LLP substitutes (Party (s) Name) Adam L. Streltzer, Esq. 175075 , State Bar No. as counsel of record in place (Name of New Attorney) place of . pro se (Name of Attorney (s) Withdrawing Appearance) Contact information for new counsel is as follows: Firm Name: ADAM L. STRELTZER, Attorney at Law Address: 1875 Century Park East, Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (424) 652-8010 E-Mail (Optional): adam@streltzer.com Facsimile (424) 652-2296 LOCAL RULE 5.1 ATTESTATION: I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. /s/ Adam L. Streltzer, Esq. (#175075) I consent to the above substitution. Date: October 22, 2015 Mishcon de Reya New York, LLP /s/ Vincent Filardo Jr., Partner (Signature of Party (s)) I consent to being substituted. Date: October 22, 2015 Mishcon de Reya New York, LLP /s/ Vincent Filardo Jr., Partner (Signature of Former Attorney (s)) I consent to the above substitution. Date: October 22, 2015 /s/ Adam L. Streltzer, Esq. (Signature of New Attorney) The substitution of attorney is hereby approved and so ORDERED. Date: November 10, 2015 Judge [Note: A separate consent order of substitution must be filed by each new attorney wishing to enter an appearance.]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?