Bicek v. C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. et al
Filing
10
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME 9 . Deadlines reset as to Third Party Motion to Quash 8 : Responses due by 7/12/2013; Replies due by 7/19/2013. Motion Hearing set for 7/31/2013 01:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/5/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
COOLEY LLP
JOSHUA O. MATES (221068) (jmates@cooley.com)
NATHAN J KLEINER (275881) (nkleiner@cooley.com)
101 California Street
5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
5
6
Attorneys for Third-Party
Natural Selections Foods, LLC
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
14
DENNIS BICEK, individually and on behalf
of all other member of the general public
similarly situated, and on behalf of aggrieved
employees pursuant to the Private Attorney
General Act (“PAGA”),
15
Plaintiff,
13
16
17
18
Case No. 3:13-mc-80130 RS
Eastern District of California
Case No. 2:13-cv-00411-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CHANGE TIME
v.
Courtroom: A -15th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Magistrate Judge
Nathanael M. Cousins
C&S WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC., a
Vermont Corporation; TRACY LOGISTICS,
LLC, an unknown business entity, and DOES
1-100 inclusive,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Third-Party Natural Selection Foods,
23
LLC, d/b/a Earthbound Farm (“Earthbound”), Plaintiff Dennis Bicek (“Plaintiff”), and
24
Defendants C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. and Tracy Logistics, LLC (“Defendants”) submit this
25
Stipulation and Proposed Order to amend the briefing schedule regarding pending motions to
26
quash a subpoena served on Earthbound by Defendants. This Stipulation and Proposed Order is
27
supported by the Declaration of Joshua O. Mates ISO this Stipulation and Proposed Order to
28
Change Time (“Mates Decl.”).
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1324904 SF
1.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-MC-80130 RS
1
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2013, Defendants served Earthbound with a Subpoena To Produce
2
Documents, Information, Or Objects Or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (the
3
“Subpoena”) issued from this Court, and served notice of the Subpoena on Plaintiff.
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed an amended motion to quash the Subpoena on June 21, 2013 in
5
this Court. (Dkt. 5) (“Amended Plaintiff Dennis Bicek’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Quash
6
Defendants’ Subpoena to Earthbound Farm Organic, LLC; Memorandum of Points and
7
Authorities in Support Thereof”) (“Plaintiff’s Motion”).
8
WHEREAS, Earthbound is filing a motion to quash the Subpoena on July 3, 2013 in this
9
Court. (“Third-Party Natural Selection Foods, LLC’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Quash
10
Defendants’ Subpoena; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof”)
11
(“Earthbound’s Motion”).
12
WHEREAS, Earthbound’s Motion and Plaintiff’s Motion concern the same Subpoena
13
(and the same documents requested to be produced pursuant to the Subpoena), and any responses
14
to such motions filed by Defendants, as well as any subsequent replies filed by Plaintiff and
15
Earthbound, will concern the same Subpoena and requested documents.
16
17
WHEREAS, the Court has set deadlines with respect to Plaintiff’s Motion that require
responses to be filed by July 5, 2013 and replies to be filed by July 12, 2013.
18
19
WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a date for Plaintiff’s Motion to be heard on July 24,
2013 at 1:00 P.M. (Dkt. 7.)
20
21
WHEREAS, it is in the interests of judicial efficiency and reflects the best use of all
parties’ time for the Court to hear these matters at the same time.
22
23
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between
the parties hereto, by their undersigned attorneys, that:
24
25
1. The briefing schedule for Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s Motion and Earthbound’s
Motion will be modified such that any such responses must be filed on or before July 12, 2013;
26
2. The briefing schedule for Earthbound and Plaintiff’s replies to Defendants’ responses,
27
if any, will be modified such that any such replies must be filed on or before July 19, 2012; and
28
///
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1324904 SF
2.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-MC-80130 RS
1
3. The hearing date for Plaintiff’s Motion and Earthbound’s Motion will be scheduled to
2
occur on July 31, 2013, at 1:00 p.m.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
Dated: July 3, 2013
5
COOLEY LLP
JOSHUA O. MATES (221068)
6
/s/ Joshua O. Mates
Joshua O. Mates (221068)
Attorneys for Third-Party
7
8
9
10
Dated: July 3, 2013
LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, PC
JILL J. PARKER (274230)
11
12
/s/ Jill J. Parker
Jill J. Parker (274230)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
13
14
15
Dated: July 3, 2013
16
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
ANDREW M. MCNAUGHT (209093)
17
/s/ Andrew M. McNaught
Andrew M. McNaught (209093)
Attorneys for Defendants
18
19
20
ATTESTATION OF FILER
21
22
23
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatory.
24
Dated: July 3, 2013
COOLEY LLP
JOSHUA O. MATES (221068)
NATHAN J. KLEINER (275881)
25
26
/s/ Joshua O. Mates
Joshua O. Mates (221068)
Attorneys for Third-Party
NATURAL SELECTION FOODS, LLC
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1324904 SF
3.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-MC-80130 RS
2
Dated: July __, 2013
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
S
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
GRAN
NO
3
thanael M
Judge Na
TED
RT
U
O
1
ER
8
A
H
7
FO
RT
6
. Cousins
LI
5
R NIA
THE HONORABLE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1324904 SF
4.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:13-MC-80130 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?