Bicek v. C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME 9 . Deadlines reset as to Third Party Motion to Quash 8 : Responses due by 7/12/2013; Replies due by 7/19/2013. Motion Hearing set for 7/31/2013 01:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/5/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 COOLEY LLP JOSHUA O. MATES (221068) (jmates@cooley.com) NATHAN J KLEINER (275881) (nkleiner@cooley.com) 101 California Street 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 5 6 Attorneys for Third-Party Natural Selections Foods, LLC 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 14 DENNIS BICEK, individually and on behalf of all other member of the general public similarly situated, and on behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”), 15 Plaintiff, 13 16 17 18 Case No. 3:13-mc-80130 RS Eastern District of California Case No. 2:13-cv-00411-MCE-KJN STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE TIME v. Courtroom: A -15th Floor Judge: Hon. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins C&S WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC., a Vermont Corporation; TRACY LOGISTICS, LLC, an unknown business entity, and DOES 1-100 inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Third-Party Natural Selection Foods, 23 LLC, d/b/a Earthbound Farm (“Earthbound”), Plaintiff Dennis Bicek (“Plaintiff”), and 24 Defendants C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. and Tracy Logistics, LLC (“Defendants”) submit this 25 Stipulation and Proposed Order to amend the briefing schedule regarding pending motions to 26 quash a subpoena served on Earthbound by Defendants. This Stipulation and Proposed Order is 27 supported by the Declaration of Joshua O. Mates ISO this Stipulation and Proposed Order to 28 Change Time (“Mates Decl.”). COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1324904 SF 1. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-MC-80130 RS 1 WHEREAS, on June 6, 2013, Defendants served Earthbound with a Subpoena To Produce 2 Documents, Information, Or Objects Or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (the 3 “Subpoena”) issued from this Court, and served notice of the Subpoena on Plaintiff. 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed an amended motion to quash the Subpoena on June 21, 2013 in 5 this Court. (Dkt. 5) (“Amended Plaintiff Dennis Bicek’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Quash 6 Defendants’ Subpoena to Earthbound Farm Organic, LLC; Memorandum of Points and 7 Authorities in Support Thereof”) (“Plaintiff’s Motion”). 8 WHEREAS, Earthbound is filing a motion to quash the Subpoena on July 3, 2013 in this 9 Court. (“Third-Party Natural Selection Foods, LLC’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Quash 10 Defendants’ Subpoena; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof”) 11 (“Earthbound’s Motion”). 12 WHEREAS, Earthbound’s Motion and Plaintiff’s Motion concern the same Subpoena 13 (and the same documents requested to be produced pursuant to the Subpoena), and any responses 14 to such motions filed by Defendants, as well as any subsequent replies filed by Plaintiff and 15 Earthbound, will concern the same Subpoena and requested documents. 16 17 WHEREAS, the Court has set deadlines with respect to Plaintiff’s Motion that require responses to be filed by July 5, 2013 and replies to be filed by July 12, 2013. 18 19 WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a date for Plaintiff’s Motion to be heard on July 24, 2013 at 1:00 P.M. (Dkt. 7.) 20 21 WHEREAS, it is in the interests of judicial efficiency and reflects the best use of all parties’ time for the Court to hear these matters at the same time. 22 23 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, by their undersigned attorneys, that: 24 25 1. The briefing schedule for Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s Motion and Earthbound’s Motion will be modified such that any such responses must be filed on or before July 12, 2013; 26 2. The briefing schedule for Earthbound and Plaintiff’s replies to Defendants’ responses, 27 if any, will be modified such that any such replies must be filed on or before July 19, 2012; and 28 /// COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1324904 SF 2. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-MC-80130 RS 1 3. The hearing date for Plaintiff’s Motion and Earthbound’s Motion will be scheduled to 2 occur on July 31, 2013, at 1:00 p.m. 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 Dated: July 3, 2013 5 COOLEY LLP JOSHUA O. MATES (221068) 6 /s/ Joshua O. Mates Joshua O. Mates (221068) Attorneys for Third-Party 7 8 9 10 Dated: July 3, 2013 LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, PC JILL J. PARKER (274230) 11 12 /s/ Jill J. Parker Jill J. Parker (274230) Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 14 15 Dated: July 3, 2013 16 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP ANDREW M. MCNAUGHT (209093) 17 /s/ Andrew M. McNaught Andrew M. McNaught (209093) Attorneys for Defendants 18 19 20 ATTESTATION OF FILER 21 22 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatory. 24 Dated: July 3, 2013 COOLEY LLP JOSHUA O. MATES (221068) NATHAN J. KLEINER (275881) 25 26 /s/ Joshua O. Mates Joshua O. Mates (221068) Attorneys for Third-Party NATURAL SELECTION FOODS, LLC 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1324904 SF 3. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-MC-80130 RS 2 Dated: July __, 2013 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED S PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 GRAN NO 3 thanael M Judge Na TED RT U O 1 ER 8 A H 7 FO RT 6 . Cousins LI 5 R NIA THE HONORABLE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge N F D IS T IC T O R C 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1324904 SF 4. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:13-MC-80130 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?