McCurry Studios LLC v. Web2Web Marketing, Inc.
Filing
33
ORDER RE AUGUST 21 HEARING AND 29 MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2014).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
STEVE MCCURRY STUDIOS, LLC,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. MC 13-80246 WHA
v.
14
15
ORDER RE AUGUST 21
HEARING AND MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME
WEB2WEB MARKETING, INC., d/b/a
ACTEVA.COM,
Defendant.
/
16
17
Plaintiff has filed two motions to compel — one set for hearing on August 21, and the
18
other set for hearing on September 3 (Dkt. Nos. 27, 30). Plaintiff has also filed a motion to
19
shorten time for hearing on the latter motion, such that both motions are heard on August 21
20
(Dkt. No. 29). Because both motions address the same set of issues, the motion to shorten time
21
is GRANTED.
22
Accordingly, the August 21 hearing will go forward as scheduled. If defendant’s
23
president and CEO Pankaj Gupta wishes to have an extension for that hearing, he must apply for
24
that extension personally or through counsel.
25
Moreover, plaintiff’s counsel are hereby ORDERED to promptly serve a copy of this order
26
on Mr. Gupta, through the most practicable means possible (including e-mail), and to further
27
advise Mr. Gupta that at the August 21 hearing, the Court will likely issue an order that would, if
28
not obeyed, in due course lead to his arrest and detention until such time as he complies with the
discovery orders.
1
If Mr. Gupta wishes to be heard on this issue, he should attend the August 21 hearing or
2
if he cannot attend on that date, he should seek to have that hearing postponed through the proper
3
procedures.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: August 15, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?