Hafiz v. Nationstar Mortgage et al

Filing 22

ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING A DEADLINE FOR SERVING IT, (2) DENYING AS MOOT NATIONWIDE'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND (3) CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The court OR DERS Plaintiff to serve Cal-Western, Deutsche Bank Trust Company as Trustee for RALI Series 2006-Q04, Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., RBS, and GMAC-RFC Ltd. with the First Amended Complaint by May 30, 2014. Plaintiff SHALL file proofs of service n o later than June 2, 2014. If Plaintiff does not serve these Defendants by June 2, 2014, the court may dismiss them from this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Alternatively, if Plaintiff decides not to proc eed against Cal-Western or any of the new Defendants, Plaintiff should file a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The court CONTINUES the initial case management conference from May 29, 2014 to June 26, 20 14 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement no later than June 19, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/6/2014.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

San Francisco Division
ASHARFUN NISH HAFIZ,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE; CALWESTERN RECONVEYANCE, LLC,

15
Defendants.
16
17

_____________________________________/

No. C 14-00015 LB
ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
SETTING A DEADLINE FOR
SERVING IT, (2) DENYING AS
MOOT NATIONWIDE’S MOTION TO
DISMISS, AND (3) CONTINUING
THE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
[Re: ECF No. 17]

18

On January 2, 2014, Plaintiff Asharfun Nish Hafiz, who is proceeding pro se, filed a complaint

19

against two Defendants: Nationstar Mortgage (“Nationstar”) and Cal-Western Reconveyance, LLC

20

(“Cal-Western”). See Complaint, ECF No. 1.1 Plaintiff alleged that Defendants violated the Fair

21

Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, and committed negligence, in relation

22

to their foreclosure of her property. See id. at 2, 7-8. Plaintiff apparently served Nationstar with the

23

complaint and summons, as it appeared and moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint,2 see Motion,

24
25
1

26
27
28

Citations are to the Electronic Case File (“ECF”) with pin cites to the electronicallygenerated page numbers at the top of the document.
2

Nationstar filed its motion on January 29, 2014 and served it on Plaintiff by mail. Plaintiff
never filed an opposition within the time allowed, and Nationstar, then, had no occasion to file a
reply. Thus, Nationstar’s motion is the only brief to be considered by the court.
C 14-00015 LB
ORDER

1
2

ECF No. 8, but Plaintiff does not appear to have served Cal-Western, see generally Docket.
Plaintiff did not timely file an opposition to Nationstar’s motion. Instead, on April 17,

First Amended Complaint, which was accompanied by a memorandum in support of an unfiled

5

motion for leave to amend the complaint. See FAC, ECF No. 17; Memo, ECF No. 18. Plaintiff’s

6

proposed First Amended Complaint re-alleges the FDCPA claim and also alleges new claims for

7

declaratory relief, intentional misrepresentation, injunctive relief, fraud, unjust enrichment,

8

cancellation of instruments, and quiet title. See FAC, ECF No. 17. It re-names Nationstar and Cal-

9

Western as defendants, but it also names four new ones: Deutsche Bank Trust Company as Trustee

10

for RALI Series 2006-Q04; Residential Accredit Loans, Inc.; RBS; and GMAC-RFC Ltd. See id.

11

Nevertheless, as Nationstar does not oppose it, see Statement of Non-Opposition, ECF No. 19, and

12
For the Northern District of California

2014—well after the time for doing so under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)—Plaintiff filed a

4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

given the interests of judicial economy and because leave to amend is freely given, the court

13

construes Plaintiff’s filings as a motion for leave to file a First Amended Complaint and finds good

14

cause to GRANT it.

15

The court’s previous statements regarding service and consent still apply, though. As the court

16

explained, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), absent good cause, a plaintiff has 120 days

17

from filing the complaint to serve defendants. And under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the court needs the

18

consent of all served parties to decide dispositive motions, such as a motion to dismiss. See 28

19

U.S.C. § 636(c). An unserved defendant, however, is not a party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See

20

Ornelas v. De Frantz, C 00-1067 JCS, 2000 WL 973684, at *2 n.2 (N.D. Cal. June 29, 2000) (citing

21

Neals v. Norwood, 59 F.3d 530, 532 (5th Cir. 1995)); cf. United States v. Real Property, 135 F. 3d

22

1312, 1316 (9th Cir. 1997) (holding that the consent of an individual who was not a party was not a

23

precondition to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction).

24

It still is unclear whether Plaintiff has served Cal-Western, and the court presumes, given the

25

lack of filed proofs of service, that Plaintiff has not yet served Deutsche Bank Trust Company as

26

Trustee for RALI Series 2006-Q04, Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., RBS, and GMAC-RFC Ltd. In

27

this situation, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to serve Cal-Western, Deutsche Bank Trust Company as

28

Trustee for RALI Series 2006-Q04, Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., RBS, and GMAC-RFC Ltd.

C 14-00015 LB
ORDER

2

1

with the First Amended Complaint by May 30, 2014. Plaintiff SHALL file proofs of service no

2

later than June 2, 2014. If Plaintiff does not serve these Defendants by June 2, 2014, the court may

3

dismiss them from this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

4

Alternatively, if Plaintiff decides not to proceed against Cal-Western or any of the new Defendants,

5

Plaintiff should file a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

6

Accordingly, the court DENIES AS MOOT Nationstar’s motion to dismiss. Nationstar shall

7

respond to the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. In

8

addition, the court CONTINUES the initial case management conference from May 29, 2014 to

9

June 26, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden
Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. The parties shall file a joint case management

11

conference statement no later than June 19, 2014.

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 6, 2014
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

C 14-00015 LB
ORDER

3